Why do you think I'm angry? Not in the least, if I'm honest I'm ambivalent to most of what the report says and to MR itself.
I'm asking why the UK government should respond to the Tynwald Committee? I thought it was a perfectly reasonable question. The fact that the BBC is mentioned in the report doesn't necessarily require UKG to respond to a Tynwald Committee, does it? I would have thought the BBC Governors might want to contribute but not UKG.