Is UKG entirely blameless in all of this?
The product was found to be of substandard quality by UKG's own appointed inspectors whilst it sat in China.
If that was the case why the feck did UKG pay MedPro? Or is UKG saying that it paid for all the goods in advance?
There's something horribly wrong about this whole debacle. Seems to me the procurement process was flawed or at the very least circumnavigated. But for the benefit of who, is anyone's guess!