Billy One Mate Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 I just thought I would help The Skeet, FCMR, Willy Wombat or whoever you are, having to create a new topic. No need to waste time now you can just post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian rush Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 I'll guess at guilty and three months suspended for three years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slinkydevil Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 Just on MR - Guilty on all 3 counts. More in-depth news later incl. sentencing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannin Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 I'll guess at guilty and three months suspended for three years. I'll wager 7p on 'Not guilty, 200k of Gvt money as compo' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannin Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 Just on MR - Guilty on all 3 counts. More in-depth news later incl. sentencing. There goes my 7p god dammit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian rush Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 You owe me 7p. BTW I wasn't in Court and haven't got a radio. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrew Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 Guilty on 3 charges and Not Guilty on the other 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannin Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 Guilty on 3 charges and Not Guilty on the other 3. and you ouwe me 7p for the 3 not guilty! We'll call it quits Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian rush Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 and could all those who said there'd never be a fair trial please take a step forward? Second gueesing, where the evidence did not need corroborating by the ill builder's evidence, she was found guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy One Mate Posted October 30, 2006 Author Share Posted October 30, 2006 I just heard from somebody at court Guilty = 4 Not Guilty = 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannin Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 I just heard from somebody at court Guilty = 4 Not Guilty = 3 Shhhhh they might that that is worth 7p again now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Old Git Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 I just heard from somebody at court Guilty = 4 Not Guilty = 3 Odd, Manx Radio are reporting 3 guilty / 3 not guilty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy One Mate Posted October 30, 2006 Author Share Posted October 30, 2006 and could all those who said there'd never be a fair trial please take a step forward? Reserve judgement on this until the sentence is announced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrew Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 IOM Online: CORKILL VERDICT - GUILTY OF FOUR CHARGES JULIE Corkill has been found guilty of four false accounting charges but cleared of two charges of deception. High Bailiff Michael Moyle delivered his verdict this afternoon (Monday) in Douglas, almost three weeks after her trial concluded. Mr Moyle is giving the reasons for his decisions now. But he told Dawn Jones, advocate for the wife of former chief minister Richard Corkill: 'I will make it abundantly clear that your client didn't set out to deliberately defraud the deprtament.' He said Mrs Corkill got caught up in events that were not entirely of her own making. Mrs Corkill said he had some degree of sympathy with the defendant. Mrs Corkill had denied four counts of false accounting and two of obtaining tourism grants by deception. The grants were paid for the development of tourist accommodation at the couple's home Ballacain, Little Mill Road, Onchan. The trial got under way in July, but was halted after just six days when Will Kelly, boss of the building company at the firm which carried out work at Mr and Mrs Corkill's home, suffered a heart attack. Hearings resumed in September. Mr Kelly resumed his evidence via video linked, but that had to be halted after 30 minutes when he suffered an angina attack. Mr Moyle ruled the trial could continue without further involvement from Mr Kelly. 30 October 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Old Git Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 IOM Online:Mrs Corkill said he had some degree of sympathy with the defendant. ??? Can't quite figure that line out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.