DjDan Posted November 23, 2006 Share Posted November 23, 2006 Peel Hannan 712 Crookall 839 Gimbert 321 Can someone explain why there was need for a recount???! I thought the votes were supposed to be close? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mission Posted November 23, 2006 Share Posted November 23, 2006 Maybe her ego was bigger than it should have been? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lfc84 Posted November 23, 2006 Share Posted November 23, 2006 Peel Hannan 712 Crookall 839 Gimbert 321 Can someone explain why there was need for a recount???! I thought the votes were supposed to be close? might have been a recount because the returning officer couldnt count it wasnt as close as i would have imagined a recount warranted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
modey Posted November 23, 2006 Share Posted November 23, 2006 any news on douglas south yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinahand Posted November 23, 2006 Share Posted November 23, 2006 Peel Hannan 712 Crookall 839 Gimbert 321 Can someone explain why there was need for a recount???! I thought the votes were supposed to be close? might have been a recount because the returning officer couldnt count it wasnt as close as i would have imagined a recount warranted Would you want to put yourself between a recount and a Hazel in denial? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojomonkey Posted November 23, 2006 Share Posted November 23, 2006 It seems the way to win a seat for Ramsey is to not actually live there! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DjDan Posted November 23, 2006 Share Posted November 23, 2006 Peel Hannan 712 Crookall 839 Gimbert 321 Can someone explain why there was need for a recount???! I thought the votes were supposed to be close? might have been a recount because the returning officer couldnt count Or perhaps to try and add some suspense and excitement out of the otherwise BORING election results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matty Posted November 23, 2006 Share Posted November 23, 2006 Good to see exactly the same names getting back in everywhere - new broom and all that Some I suppose were expected, some others have had a bit more 'competition' than they otherwise might have expected, - at least the voter turnout seems to be up a bit in most cases, shows some of the people are paying attention, and at least trying to make a difference. Don't forget those percentages are percentages of the lower number of people registered to vote this time around. Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that the percentage of registered voters, who turned out to vote were higher this time round than the last election? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juan Kerr Posted November 23, 2006 Share Posted November 23, 2006 It seems the way to win a seat for Ramsey is to not actually live there! Tell me though. What happened to Singer. Has he followed through on his promise to resign as MLC on the day. He must be well pissed off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxman8180 Posted November 23, 2006 Share Posted November 23, 2006 Middle Quayle 963 Beecroft 548 Jessop 413 Great, the only one who couldn't be arsed to come and personally visit my gaff (or any of my immediate neighbourse as well) get's re-elected. Ferkin load of sheep shaggers around here. Twat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matty Posted November 23, 2006 Share Posted November 23, 2006 Peel Hannan 712 Crookall 839 Gimbert 321 Can someone explain why there was need for a recount???! I thought the votes were supposed to be close? might have been a recount because the returning officer couldnt count Or perhaps to try and add some suspense and excitement out of the otherwise BORING election results. Well, a 'bit' exciting Hazel getting the 'boot'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinahand Posted November 23, 2006 Share Posted November 23, 2006 Rimmington's gone!! Replaced by Watterson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonan3 Posted November 23, 2006 Share Posted November 23, 2006 Watterson, Gawne, Gill in Rushen - but no figures yet! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matty Posted November 23, 2006 Share Posted November 23, 2006 Rimmington out? Shame - thought he was quite a good 'cookie' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frances Posted November 23, 2006 Share Posted November 23, 2006 Well, a 'bit' exciting Hazel getting the 'boot'? Peel has changed a lot with the new housing estate - she was however the only one who sent me a manifesto but Crookall was a Peel commissioner as well as the postie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.