crumlin Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 The Case of CU Plas Callow against RK & J Corkill was again adjourned today due to the defendants Advocates not being ready to proceed. It will come before the Courts again on Feb 28th 2005. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ripsaw Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 I saw a programme once (not factual, perhaps "Changing Lanes"?) and the judge suggested that enough time had elapsed to put a case together. If the lawyer wasn't ready, tough, the case was going ahead... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Old Git Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 At least it's not February 29th It is a bit farcical though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ripsaw Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 Remember this quote? the prolonged public pressure that his family was enduring while the Ballacain Cottage allegations were investigated. Oh well, so his brief has just given him 3 more months of public speculation. Nice one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Old Git Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 All over a couple of thousand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Addie Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 Do we know who's paying the legal bills yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crumlin Posted December 6, 2004 Author Share Posted December 6, 2004 Do we know who's paying the legal bills yet? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well Bell got his paid for at Mount Murry, so one of the MHKs is going to ask the question in Tynwald, whos paying Neds, Ned or the Taxpayer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Addie Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 As long as we're aware of the precedent and we can all get litigious as hell in the certain knowledge that our legal bills paid by everyone else. This a club class type of legal aid scheme? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ripsaw Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 Bell got his paid for at Mount Murry, so one of the MHKs is going to ask the question in Tynwald, whos paying Neds, Ned or the Taxpayer Bell had his paid by the taxpayer because he was "at work" at the time. For personal cases it should all be funded personally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.