thesultanofsheight Posted August 3, 2008 Share Posted August 3, 2008 Give him a few years and he'll bollocks it up again and end up inside - he'll be under so much media attention the next time he pesters a woman in a park or gets his cock out on a train or whatever he'll be back in the big house. I think some sort of work lottery would be worth it on this one (a bit like the snuff it club). A loony with form like that is going to end up back inside soon particularly with the press now looking at everything he does. What Barry the serial sex-pest does next? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
immortalpuppet Posted August 3, 2008 Share Posted August 3, 2008 Sounds like the making of a new Viz story line. not that i am trying to take away the seriousness of the thread away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hboy Posted August 3, 2008 Share Posted August 3, 2008 Sounds like the making of a new Viz story line. not that i am trying to take away the seriousness of the thread away. Fact is though that you wouldn't even believe it if you read it in Viz would you? What sort of Viz character would be the cousin of Freddie Mercury and Jeff Lynne from ELO, who was an SAS hero and a rollerskating six million dollarman obsessed stuntman who jumped London buses, but was also a convicted rapist and sex-pest who photographed thousands of woman, pestered woman for sex in the street and had an obsession with guns and the territorial army who got mistakenly jailed for shooting a TV star but whose alibi was that he was actually stalking another woman at the time it happened. Maybe they could call it the amazingly fucked up world of Barry George - premier league idiot. There would be one good Viz sketch though. According to the previous link in this thread he also once thought it was "funny" to kick down the door of a mates flat dressed in combat gear and fire blanks at his family as they ate their tea. Bet they pissed themselves laughing ... shortly after they shit themselves! That might work for Viz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheeky boy Posted August 3, 2008 Share Posted August 3, 2008 There must be thousands of celebrity obsessed nut-jobs in London, with that many to choose from the cops must have had a pretty good idea that it was this guy. He lived in Fulham and knew the area well, he obviously had a grudge against women and would have had no trouble getting hold of a gun. The cops didn't arrest him until a year after the murder giving him plenty of time to get rid of forensic evidence. Just because he is thick a shit does not mean he is incapable of committing the crime and getting away unnoticed IMO anyone who names themself after Gary Glitter deserves to be hung, regardless of anything else they may have done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mollag Posted August 4, 2008 Share Posted August 4, 2008 Fair do's no one likes a nonce, but fitting them up or jailing them without fair evidence is not the way to go. Give the judiciary those powers and they will soon start doing likewise to the straights, leaving the real perpetrators free to carry on as before. He must have done it guv, or he is capable of doing it is no grounds for prosecution. Without research three names come to mind Barry George Stephen Kisko Colin Stagg Probably a longer list could be formed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted August 4, 2008 Share Posted August 4, 2008 Don't blame the judiciary; blame the police who put the case together, the CPS for deciding it was worth taking to court and the jury for agreeing. Can't remember the circumstnaces of the Stephen Kisko matter, but Colin Stagg and Barry George were 'fitted up' by the police. Sure, they were unsavoury characters, but you should be guilty of more than that to end up in prison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mollag Posted August 4, 2008 Share Posted August 4, 2008 Don't blame the judiciary; blame the police who put the case together, the CPS for deciding it was worth taking to court and the jury for agreeing. Can't remember the circumstnaces of the Stephen Kisko matter, but Colin Stagg and Barry George were 'fitted up' by the police. Sure, they were unsavoury characters, but you should be guilty of more than that to end up in prison. Stephen was a tad retarded and was pulled in for the assault and murder of Lesley Moleseed. He was blagged and bullied into a confession. The forensics though proved he was innocent, [seminal secreter?] the police hid the forensics and he served a lot of hard time as a beast in jail before the evidence resurfaced. One wonders where the real murder was and what he was doing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sausages Posted August 4, 2008 Share Posted August 4, 2008 but Colin Stagg and Barry George were 'fitted up' by the police. How was Barry George 'fitted up' by the police? He was taken to court without much hard evidence - not with made up evidence. The people who took him to court were / are convinced they got the right man (& they'll be privy to a lot that we don't know), knew they wouldn't get any more evidence, so took a chance and went to court anyway. Poor decision, but not a 'fit-up'. Of course the jury are instructed to only look at the evidence, but they don't always, which is why he was found guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mollag Posted August 4, 2008 Share Posted August 4, 2008 And Colin Stagg and Stephen Kisco? How the Barry George "evidence" happened to be found after 12 months should be looked into---our boys in blue?--plant/hide evidence? no way! And he was wearing a bulky coat with a haversack, then he jumped the barriers----gorra be guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ripped&Torn Posted August 6, 2008 Share Posted August 6, 2008 thought for a minute we were talking about Bobby George - was just about to start a Sid Waddell thread ......sorry, unforgivable that one...its been a long day....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesultanofsheight Posted August 6, 2008 Share Posted August 6, 2008 thought for a minute we were talking about Bobby George Its an easy mistake - both of them being fat useless c*nts and all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted August 6, 2008 Share Posted August 6, 2008 but Colin Stagg and Barry George were 'fitted up' by the police. How was Barry George 'fitted up' by the police? He was taken to court without much hard evidence - not with made up evidence. The people who took him to court were / are convinced they got the right man (& they'll be privy to a lot that we don't know), knew they wouldn't get any more evidence, so took a chance and went to court anyway. Poor decision, but not a 'fit-up'. Of course the jury are instructed to only look at the evidence, but they don't always, which is why he was found guilty. By fit-up, I mean fitting the evidence to meet the crime, not necessarily manufacturing evidence (although that need not be excluded). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheeky boy Posted August 6, 2008 Share Posted August 6, 2008 Without research three names come to mind Barry George Stephen Kisko Colin Stagg Probably a longer list could be formed You missed James Hanratty " wrongly" hanged for the notorious A6 murder & rape in 1962 A campaign by his family and supporters presented evidence "proving " that he was innocent and a couple of tv documentaries said the same thing Hanratty's body was exhumed in 1991 and DNA was taken When compared against DNA from the murder weapon and the rape victim Hanratty's was a perfect match proving beyond doubt that he did it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted August 6, 2008 Share Posted August 6, 2008 Then, there is Craig and Bentley, the 'let him have it' boys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mollag Posted August 7, 2008 Share Posted August 7, 2008 Without research three names come to mind Barry George Stephen Kisko Colin Stagg Probably a longer list could be formed You missed James Hanratty " wrongly" hanged for the notorious A6 murder & rape in 1962 A campaign by his family and supporters presented evidence "proving " that he was innocent and a couple of tv documentaries said the same thing Hanratty's body was exhumed in 1991 and DNA was taken When compared against DNA from the murder weapon and the rape victim Hanratty's was a perfect match proving beyond doubt that he did it Yes he was guilty, does that in some way excuse what the police did to Stephen Kisko or Colin Stagg? they were proven innocent not found to be guilty. FM the police surpressed evidence of Kiskos innocence. Can you imagine being innocent and jailed for the rape and murder of a child? And again how does an innocent being jailed serve society, it leaves the guilty tw@ out there to kill again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.