Newsbot Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 Housing stock could be sold to tenants under a scheme being considered by Castletown commissioners. Source : http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/world/...man/7668466.stm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tugger Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 They just need allocating correctly, not selling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tearz Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 I hope any cash raised will be ploughed back into building new commissioners housing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojomonkey Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 I'd be interested to know how many of the commissioners are amongst the 44%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moghrey Mie Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 I hope any cash raised will be ploughed back into building new commissioners housing It wasn't in the UK and is unlikely to be here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted October 13, 2008 Share Posted October 13, 2008 Well, it ought to be. IMHO that was one of the reasons we had the 1980's housing boom and bust. I agree with social housing being sold to those that want to, but the proceeds should be used to build more for those that need it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ai_Droid Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 Not too sure about the timing of this proposal with a bank crisis on the go.However, why not give tenants the option and at the same time set the rents on a means basis. It would seem to be fairer. Who would opt for higher rents? I agree with the others, it's a good way of freeing up housing but only if the proceeds are used to build more houses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wake Up Call Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 Not too sure about the timing of this proposal with a bank crisis on the go. However, why not give tenants the option and at the same time set the rents on a means basis. It would seem to be fairer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Tatlock Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 I too agree that they should be sold off to those that want to buy them, but only on a buy and replace basis. If mortgages are going to be difficult to obtain (and 'the days of easy money are over') the selling and rebuilding of council houses here would provide a lot of building jobs until the housing sector settles to the level it ends up at (which I suspect will be at 4 to 5 most times earnings). Selling and rebuilding say 600 council houses that are needed could generate around £300M profit which could then be used to build the additional first time homes desperately needed here, and help us out in the event of a slow down (but hopefully with recent world events we will avoid the worst of now). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith brief Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 I've never really understood the concept of buying your council house. It was always my impression that it was a temporary arrangement for those most in need of housing, provided until such a point the occupier could afford to move on and buy a place. If the tennants can afford to buy a house, why don't they buy a private one and vacate their current house in favour of someone who needs it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ai_Droid Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 I've never really understood the concept of buying your council house. It was always my impression that it was a temporary arrangement for those most in need of housing, provided until such a point the occupier could afford to move on and buy a place. If the tennants can afford to buy a house, why don't they buy a private one and vacate their current house in favour of someone who needs it? Because they're not temporary, once you get one, you're in for good. The occupants circumstances aren't revised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Wright Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 I don't buy thus 44% housing in Castletown is public. ie Commissioners or DLGE There are, according to the 2006 census 1269 housing units in castletown of which accordingf to the 2007 Housing report 254 are public. I calculate that percentage as just less than 20% There are just over 5,000 public housing units on the Ilsand and there are 33,390 housing units Island wide which is just under 15% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Tatlock Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 I've never really understood the concept of buying your council house. It was always my impression that it was a temporary arrangement for those most in need of housing, provided until such a point the occupier could afford to move on and buy a place. If the tennants can afford to buy a house, why don't they buy a private one and vacate their current house in favour of someone who needs it? UK schemes take into account the amount of time tenants have lived there i.e. How much rent has been paid, which affects the buying price. This ensures older people >40 get the chance to get a mortgage too, and are not faced with a 25 year mortgage. I think the schemes are a good idea as it encourages people to not give up and to try harder, even if their circumstances mean they are in council accomodation. It also allows the council to build new housing stock (which they failed to do in the UK) - and mix tenants and homeowners leading to better quality estates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Domino Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 It also allows the council to build new housing stock (which they failed to do in the UK) - and mix tenants and homeowners leading to better quality estates. Mixing tenants and homeowners has NEVER led to better quality estates. Council tenants are lower down the class scale and jealous of homeowners financial status Homeowners are higher up the class scale and resentful / snobbish towards council tenants. Unfortunately the above statements are facts of life that will never improve the quality of estates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimcalagon Posted October 14, 2008 Share Posted October 14, 2008 Mixing tenants and homeowners has NEVER led to better quality estates.Council tenants are lower down the class scale and jealous of homeowners financial status Homeowners are higher up the class scale and resentful / snobbish towards council tenants. Unfortunately the above statements are facts of life that will never improve the quality of estates This is complete and utter bollocks of the highest order. I grew up in just such a situation (on both sides of your mythical divide) and am therefore speaking from experience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.