La_Dolce_Vita Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7960798.stm I think the idea of cutting off people's body parts for a probable slight decrease in the chances of them getting a sexual disease as quite sick in itself. What is wrong with condoms? (I did hear that the reason why it is so common in the United States is because of the influence of Jewish doctors in American hospitals who give medical reasons for why it should be carried out, but will no doubt have religious reasons why it should be done.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tribz Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7960798.stm I think the idea of cutting off people's body parts for a probable slight decrease in the chances of them getting a sexual disease as quite sick in itself. What is wrong with condoms? (I did hear that the reason why it is so common in the United States is because of the influence of Jewish doctors in American hospitals who give medical reasons for why it should be carried out, but will no doubt have religious reasons why it should be done.) Those figures look more than just a 'slight decrease' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Ayres Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stavros Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 ...doesn't look silly and makes the cock look bigger. So what you're saying is that Declan just got circumcised, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitro Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 Well people will always have a choice, fact of reduced dieseases or not, hardly worth discussing is it!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stavros Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 Well people will always have a choice, fact of reduced dieseases or not, hardly worth discussing is it!? I dunno, it kinda fits in well with the recently proposed "Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation Bill 2009” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheeky boy Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 (I did hear that the reason why it is so common in the United States is because of the influence of Jewish doctors in American hospitals who give medical reasons for why it should be carried out, but will no doubt have religious reasons why it should be done.) Jewish circumcision is traditionally carried out by the Rabbi The pay is rather poor, 50 quid a week plus tips Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keyboarder Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 It's cleaner and enhances the sex act, doesn't look silly and makes the cock look bigger. As desperate a piece of self reflection as I've ever read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinahand Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 I think the idea of cutting off people's body parts for a probable slight decrease in the chances of them getting a ... disease as quite sick in itself. Yeah, that medical profession just make stuff up in order to justify removing tonsils. Are you obsessed with sexuality LDV? Or do you have any other objections that foreskins are in some way different from tonsils? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La_Dolce_Vita Posted March 27, 2009 Author Share Posted March 27, 2009 What's wrong with being circumcised? It's cleaner and enhances the sex act, doesn't look silly and makes the cock look bigger.And witnessing anti-judaism from LDV, interesting. Because I think it seems quite barbaric and unnecessary to chop bits off people unless there is medical necessity. It is normal to have it. What do you mean by my anti-judiasm. I was referring to the reasons why it is practised so much in America, though the story may have been a misconception. Are you obsessed with sexuality LDV? Or do you have any other objections that foreskins are in some way different from tonsils? I find sexuality and gender issues to be very interesting, but this isn't really about sexuality, is it? It was a headline in today's news that interested me. Foreskins are different from tonsils. Foreskins get removed because of the crazy ideas of religious people and now you have people saying they should be removed so that person will have a slightly lower risk of disease in future, when you could advocate condoms instead. Don't see why it should be seen to be acceptable to so readily cut things off. But tonsils are removed when there is necessity to do. (Though of course, circumcision is often carried out when there there are medical problems that require it.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gazza Posted March 27, 2009 Share Posted March 27, 2009 i dont know, sometimes cutting things of ppl my not be a bad idea, how many fingers do u need to loose b4 u cant type anymore! im kidding Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluemonday Posted March 27, 2009 Share Posted March 27, 2009 makes the cock look bigger. Driving like a twat seems to be a popular and viable alternative locally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbms Posted March 27, 2009 Share Posted March 27, 2009 Saw a Jewish boy sat crying outside the Synagogue in the cold and I asked him what was wrong. He said "someone in there has taken my pullover" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Peters Posted March 27, 2009 Share Posted March 27, 2009 Barbaric and totally misguided. It's religious mutilation in 99% of cases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Old Git Posted March 27, 2009 Share Posted March 27, 2009 Foreskins are different from tonsils But quite close in some instances? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.