rockdweller Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 Teachers may lose jobs I just wondered what people's thoughts were on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x-in-man Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 maybe these could go together Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Tatlock Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 Teachers may lose jobs I just wondered what people's thoughts were on this. Perhaps they could put the redundant teachers to work on the £40M airfield extension we don't need - or maybe employ them to help hand out the envelopes containing the £150M of taxpayers money the government are handing back to KSF depositors. It's many of our politicians that should be being sacked NOW, most of them have been incapable and redundant for years. At least take the extra education budget out of their expense accounts, or their way above average pension I say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knoxville Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 I just hope its some teachers I hated, I would love to see them down the post office cashing up that dole cheque.........." teaching doing you well then " hahahahahahahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fubar Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 Teachers may lose jobs I just wondered what people's thoughts were on this. Perhaps they could put the redundant teachers to work on the £40M airfield extension we don't need - or maybe employ them to help hand out the envelopes containing the £150M of taxpayers money the government are handing back to KSF depositors. It's many of our politicians that should be being sacked NOW, most of them have been incapable and redundant for years. At least take the extra education budget out of their expense accounts, or their way above average pension I say. Albert, maybe some of our politicians could open a brothel, after all, they have been paid generously for many years to f*** us and surely this experience should not go to waste! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDave Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 They'll get laid off and then get paid double to come back as part time supply teachers instead - just like the retired ones do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
overkill101 Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 It'll be interesting to see how the new secondary school copes with the lack of teachers...or will it thrive at the expense of the other schools I wonder? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockdweller Posted April 9, 2009 Author Share Posted April 9, 2009 They'll get laid off and then get paid double to come back as part time supply teachers instead - just like the retired ones do. In fairness, that's not what happens. The only reason they appear to get more is because they don't get paid through the holidays, like teachers on contracts (where pay is evened out over 12 months). Supply teachers just get paid for what they do. I doubt that'll happen anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Tatlock Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 The next unemployment figures will be out next week (and won't include any of the 107 plus announced this week) - this graph sort of puts things in perspective a little more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tugger Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 We could halve the number of MHKs quite comfortably, stop paying MLCs, and have teachers instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x-in-man Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 It'll be interesting to see how the new secondary school copes with the lack of teachers...or will it thrive at the expense of the other schools I wonder? Its not new - its a replacement - so its already staffed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dodger Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 REVENUE ESTIMATES 2009-2010 Gross Net Expenditure Income Expenditure EDUCATION Primary Education 22,019,500 22,019,500 Secondary Education 26,827,200 26,827,200 IOM College 9,049,400 9,049,400 Higher Education 834,900 834,900 Universities etc Awards 11,981,000 66,400 11,914,600 Works Department 4,945,100 10,000 4,935,100 Estates 50,000 50,000 Meals & Milk Service 1,472,400 978,500 493,900 Youth & Community Services 1,703,100 29,000 1,674,100 Education Improvement Service 6,074,200 74,000 6,000,200 Special Needs 8,288,100 3,600 8,284,500 Central 12,331,800 163,200 12,168,600 TOTAL 105,576,700 1,324,700 104,252,000 2008/9 EDUCATION Primary Education 26,603,200 45,700 26,557,500 Secondary Education 28,675,500 92,600 28,582,900 Further Education 9,772,300 9,772,300 Special Education 7,608,200 3,500 7,604,700 Works Department 6,258,100 6,100 6,252,000 Universities etc Awards 10,761,200 74,500 10,686,700 Education Improvement Service 6,080,700 51,900 6,028,800 Meals & Milk Service 1,334,700 953,900 380,800 Youth & Community Services 1,580,300 30,100 1,550,200 Administration 2,089,900 1,600 2,088,300 TOTAL 100,764,100 1,259,900 99,504,200 I would have to question the Central figure....................anyone got any ideas? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alias Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 Maybe it'll be an excuse to get rid of the shit teachers that head teachers/boards normally couldn't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManxStacey Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 Maybe it'll be an excuse to get rid of the shit teachers that head teachers/boards normally couldn't I could name plenty get my vote! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballaughbiker Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 Quite, shame you can't edit other people's posts that contain your posting as a quote. Welcome to MF, you live and learn. Maybe....... Anyway back to the thread. Isn't this 'shortage of money' caused by the school budgets not being aligned with the financial year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.