Terse Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 NZ Herald LINK ...Or would you try doing a runner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Toad Of Toad Hall Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 I hope that these guys are caught and severely punished for this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenose 52 Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 I hope that these guys are caught and severely punished for this If your charging £60 per head per night for homestay so should you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Toad Of Toad Hall Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 I hope that these guys are caught and severely punished for this If your charging £60 per head per night for homestay so should you. My guests have always been very happy about their stay at my house Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Godfather of Manx House Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 Top sleuthing BN 52 ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Roo Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 I hope that these guys are caught and severely punished for this If your charging £60 per head per night for homestay so should you. My guests have always been very happy about their stay at my house Joking aside i am wondering why you are charging an excessive £60 per night per person,it does seem rather a lot to pay for "homestay",i understood that there were guidelines on what one could infact charge for this kind of holiday accomodation!You talk of a "rip off steam packet" etc but it does seem the "rip off" is a little nearer to home Toadie!If you have 2 people to stay with you for 1 week thats £840,just for bed & breakfast, i assume you dont charge extra for breakfast!No wonder the tourism industry is going down the loo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 see Toad, read Troll. Ignore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La_Dolce_Vita Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 Hahaha, oops. I'd assume that it would be the bank that would take the hit and not the customer's of the bank? If so, then let them live it up a little, although I don't them keeping all of that money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vulgarian Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 Good on them. Redistribute the wealth amongst the proletariat! etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La_Dolce_Vita Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 Good on them. Redistribute the wealth amongst the proletariat! etc. Somehow I unfortunately doubt that would ever happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebees Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 Depends, I have always maintained a high threshold level for dishonesty, at the moment I reckon I would 'disappear' for £4million. Anything less 'just isn't worth it', my life as it is, is great, however I could do a lot (for others) with £4million so might be tempted to trade in my cushty life & go be Robin Hood. I don't think in reality I would but it's fun to muse the possibility. If I was them, I'd be running like billy-o. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 yerr i think i may do one as well..lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bellyup Posted May 27, 2009 Share Posted May 27, 2009 Hahaha, oops. I'd assume that it would be the bank that would take the hit and not the customer's of the bank? Dont you belive it look at the Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander IOM fiasco. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Toad Of Toad Hall Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 Hahaha, oops. I'd assume that it would be the bank that would take the hit and not the customer's of the bank? Dont you belive it look at the Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander IOM fiasco. yes-Bellyup I have to agree with you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La_Dolce_Vita Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 Hahaha, oops. I'd assume that it would be the bank that would take the hit and not the customer's of the bank? Dont you belive it look at the Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander IOM fiasco. yes-Bellyup I have to agree with you I don't know too much about this Singer and Friedlander fiasco. But in this instance it was an error that lay with the bank which created this situation. The bank could not easily and would not want to foist its problem onto the customer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.