Mr. Sausages Posted July 25, 2009 Share Posted July 25, 2009 So you actually disagree with the way it's dealt with (i.e. punishment & help) rather than the legality of it? Well criminal law only exists to punish people, unless in exceptional circumstances where it is recognised that punishment doesn't do any good. But you agree that there needs to be a rule, a line that shouldn't be crossed, and if it is crossed then some sort of authority should step in to rectify the matter in some way. That's why getting your cock out and showing it to a stranger is illegal. It's crossing that line. Do you see? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Roo Posted July 25, 2009 Share Posted July 25, 2009 "SOME"? Maybe. I'm quite use to seeing little pricks everywhere i go! But a guy who decides to get his dick out (limp or erect is irrelevant) is just a sad person!Look at all the interesting things the Island has to offer....And yet he finds getting his winkie out in public more satisfying. Like I said, I don't think the flashing thing is a nice thing at all. Just the winkie then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhumsaa Posted July 25, 2009 Share Posted July 25, 2009 But you are not a 60 year old lady are you!You cant possibly say what is or is not threatening to another Are we talking size here? like... a 5 inch wiggling at you is ok but a swinging 12 incher is just downright scary? emoticons shown below so do these faces go in order... - it's christmas and the wrapping is off - foreplay - "sorry it slipped" - ah that's the right place now roo? are you experienced in flashers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhumsaa Posted July 25, 2009 Share Posted July 25, 2009 So you actually disagree with the way it's dealt with (i.e. punishment & help) rather than the legality of it? Well criminal law only exists to punish people, unless in exceptional circumstances where it is recognised that punishment doesn't do any good. But you agree that there needs to be a rule, a line that shouldn't be crossed, and if it is crossed then some sort of authority should step in to rectify the matter in some way. That's why getting your cock out and showing it to a stranger is illegal. It's crossing that line. Do you see? I have the image from south park of the left hand serial killer reading this post.... just what I need when discussing flashing interesting side note what if the person does not cross the line but due to unforseen excitement his winkie does? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Roo Posted July 25, 2009 Share Posted July 25, 2009 But you are not a 60 year old lady are you!You cant possibly say what is or is not threatening to another Are we talking size here? like... a 5 inch wiggling at you is ok but a swinging 12 incher is just downright scary? emoticons shown below so do these faces go in order... - it's christmas and the wrapping is off - foreplay - "sorry it slipped" - ah that's the right place now roo? are you experienced in flashers? Er yes, and no, but probably no, yes definately NO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La_Dolce_Vita Posted July 25, 2009 Share Posted July 25, 2009 But you agree that there needs to be a rule, a line that shouldn't be crossed, and if it is crossed then some sort of authority should step in to rectify the matter in some way. That's why getting your cock out and showing it to a stranger is illegal. It's crossing that line. Do you see? I don't think this is good behaviour but I don't think it is a serious issue either. The rule is there because male genitalia is not allowed to be shown in public. The only difference between nude people walking through Strand Street and this is that the flasher is motivated by sexual issues (though not conducting a sexual act). It's illegality doesn't make much sense to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sausages Posted July 25, 2009 Share Posted July 25, 2009 I expect lots of things don't make sense to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gladys Posted July 26, 2009 Share Posted July 26, 2009 Without wanting to make light, I seem to recall that some 'flashers' charged with indecent exposure were actually just blokes being caught relieving themselves (in the urinary, as opposed to gentlemanly, sense). We don't exactly know what happened so can't make any assessment of how we would react in the situation. Clearly, the lady found it threatening or she wouldn't have reported it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silentbob Posted July 26, 2009 Share Posted July 26, 2009 But you agree that there needs to be a rule, a line that shouldn't be crossed, and if it is crossed then some sort of authority should step in to rectify the matter in some way. That's why getting your cock out and showing it to a stranger is illegal. It's crossing that line. Do you see? I don't think this is good behaviour but I don't think it is a serious issue either. The rule is there because male genitalia is not allowed to be shown in public. The only difference between nude people walking through Strand Street and this is that the flasher is motivated by sexual issues (though not conducting a sexual act). It's illegality doesn't make much sense to me. Christ LDV, you really are full of shit. Just pray that this guy got his jollies enough from flashing, that in the future, you are not arguing that him raping some poor lass and its illegality doesn't make much sense to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La_Dolce_Vita Posted July 26, 2009 Share Posted July 26, 2009 Christ LDV, you really are full of shit.Just pray that this guy got his jollies enough from flashing, that in the future, you are not arguing that him raping some poor lass and its illegality doesn't make much sense to you. What has rape got to do with this? Clearly, the lady found it threatening or she wouldn't have reported it. Unless she thought it just indecent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BishopFinger Posted July 26, 2009 Share Posted July 26, 2009 Unless she thought it just indecent. I'm more inclined to believe that she didn't fancy they guy or what he had on show. There are plenty of women who will gladly look at something they like, only to bitch and complain if it doesn't come up to the minimum standards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Roo Posted July 26, 2009 Share Posted July 26, 2009 Unless she thought it just indecent. I'm more inclined to believe that she didn't fancy they guy or what he had on show. There are plenty of women who will gladly look at something they like, only to bitch and complain if it doesn't come up to the minimum standards. A personal experience? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BishopFinger Posted July 26, 2009 Share Posted July 26, 2009 A personal experience? Yeah.. that's why refuse to take stripping gigs at venues where they offer a money back policy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monthlycurse Posted July 26, 2009 Share Posted July 26, 2009 Its a bit of a presumption that he was exposing himself to the dog walker really. Maybe he was intending to catch the attention of the dog! Was the dog wearing pants? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n3il88 Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 Ah christ I live pretty near, ah well I aint a middle aged women so maybe I'll be spared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.