La_Dolce_Vita Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 Whereas you sound a little like the Paedofinder Generale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hboy Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 Whereas you sound a little like the Paedofinder Generale. I still have an original copy of the Witchfinder General LP. That puts me in a particular age bracket and experience threshold sonny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nosferatu Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 "Blah blah the age of consent in some countries is x and in other countries its y" etc etc Roman Polanski chose to DRUG AND SODOMISE a 13 yr old in a state where age of consent is 18 so by their definition he is immediately guilty of statutory rape .The fact that he drugged the girl makes it even more serious so by that states definition he is a rapist and paedophile therefore he should pay whatever penalty that state decides to mete out . I really can't get my head round the fact people are trying to defend this cunt . Re Miss Roo If I caught a 21yr old bloke in bed with my 13 yr old daughter I would give him 3 choices . A : I inform the police and he ends up on sex offenders register etc . B : I put him in hospital , but no police therefore no sex offenders register and I'd ask for a guarantee that he never contacts my daughter again . C : I let my wife deal with him , which would probably involve him losing 2 of his closest friends . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La_Dolce_Vita Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 Because he is only going to get charged with shagging a minor from what I understand BECAUSE he of his plea bargain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hboy Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 Because he is only going to get charged with shagging a minor from what I understand BECAUSE he of his plea bargain. Well maybe we can debate AMERICAN justice next? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La_Dolce_Vita Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 Well it would seem to be what is most pertinent. It is the American justice system that he faced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MilitantDogOwner Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 Not wanting to over complicate this debate Over complicate? Between Seborf talking through his arse, and MDO posing as Gary Giltters best mate I'm not sure where else this thread can go. Sigh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macmannin Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 Wanna be in my gang MDO? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MilitantDogOwner Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 No thanks. Why don't you and Hboy get back to Your Jeremy Kyle show while the adults carrying on with the grown discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macmannin Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 While you think up legalities to excuse your bag of yeast behaviour? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MilitantDogOwner Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 While you think up legalities to excuse your bag of yeast behaviour? Not quite sure what your trying to say there..."bag of yeast"? Must be a Manx saying. I'm not trying to excuse anything through legalities. Your just trying to portray me as something I am not. Thanks for adding to the conversation though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mollag Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 Sounds like rhyming slang for "beast", prison term for a nonce or sexual offender--ie Gary Glitter status in nick. Purely an obsevation, i relate it to no one on the forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hboy Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 Why don't you and Hboy get back to Your Jeremy Kyle show while the adults carrying on with the grown discussion. Grown up discussion from you? Don't make me laugh. I've gone back through this thread and there are more posts disagreeing with you than agreeing with you. It sort of suggests that most posters think that your talking complete shite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MilitantDogOwner Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 Why don't you and Hboy get back to Your Jeremy Kyle show while the adults carrying on with the grown discussion. Grown up discussion from you? Don't make me laugh. I've gone back through this thread and there are more posts disagreeing with you than agreeing with you. It sort of suggests that most posters think that your talking complete shite. Just because idiots shout louder doesn't make them any more correct. You prove that every time you touch a keyboard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilly G. Ossenfeffer Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 If I caught a 21yr old bloke in bed with my 13 yr old daughter I would give him 3 choices .A : I inform the police and he ends up on sex offenders register etc . B : I put him in hospital , but no police therefore no sex offenders register and I'd ask for a guarantee that he never contacts my daughter again . C : I let my wife deal with him , which would probably involve him losing 2 of his closest friends . Hmm well before you loose it and beat him up - or set your wife on him - you would hopefully feel obligated to report him him to the police so that other 13 year old girls might be spared the same experience as your daughter. After all, if someone else had reported him instead of beating him up and letting him move on, he might not have been in a position to gain access to another child to abuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.