Declan Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 PK re-read Manxman's post, perhaps in relation to the one before it from Paul H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxman8180 Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 PK re-read Manxman's post, perhaps in relation to the one before it from Paul H. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Ta Declan. Sorry, I wasn't about earlier to clarify. Maybe I was unclear, but I was questioning the randomness of the concept of Birth Control for those that Paul H were 'not worthy' of being parents. As soon as the state starts to decide who can and cannot procreate then IMO we have even more problems than we have today. Is it our wish to cleanse society and only allow the 'pure' to flourish? Someone else tried that in Europe a few years ago...didn't go down to well I seem to recall. P.K....I admitted to being confused by Paul H's post and asked him to clarify what he meant by 'birth control' which he has subsequently done. Did you really pick up from my post that I was proposing a method? I honestly don't think it reads like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carter Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 But then I wouldn't have been able to tease someone into making themselves look like a fool. Do keep up old bean. And yes, it was out of context your comment. I wasn't offering any opinion on the severity of the crime or the impact on the victim. Just, as Declan says, pointing out there is a higher chance or it happening if you're a bloke. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I see youv'e lost none of your 'charm' Ans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kite Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 seems that the sarcasm train has missed everyones station dont it PK whooooosh Looks to me like the sarcasm train doesn't stop at your station. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.K. Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 P.K....I admitted to being confused by Paul H's post and asked him to clarify what he meant by 'birth control' which he has subsequently done. Did you really pick up from my post that I was proposing a method? I honestly don't think it reads like that. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I did realise you were being sarcastic. That is why my particular post is "unlike" me shall we say. It was just a tease in the hope you would then try and explain it away in an amusing way ie what a thicko you are PK etc etc. You didn't but others picked it up on your behalf - how good is that! This thread and "the disappeared" were the best in ages so I was just messing around a bit. Slow work day and all that. I think PaulH is right in some ways though. Not exactly birth control in the common usage but more irresponsible parents should not be a burden on society. I mean, genuine need fair enough but the likes of the Bardsleys should not continue churning out children they obviously cannot support. - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hollandaise Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 Boys, boys! This is getting like a scrap in the playground. Calm down or you'll all be facing detention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.K. Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 Nanny Whip, will that mean punishment? Oh, I do hope so.... - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
happy camper Posted March 15, 2005 Share Posted March 15, 2005 We need more children so that they can support us when we're old. Some of them will hopefully avoid prison and end up getting jobs to pay for our pensions. My God I am selfish tonight! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.