Jump to content

Once Famous Only For Sitting On A Lesbian


Recommended Posts

Charles 'Can't Bear' BBC's Nicholas Witchell

 

By Laura Elston, PA Deputy Court Correspondent

 

 

The Prince of Wales was said to have regretted his comments about the BBC’s royal correspondent who he branded as “awful”.

 

Charles was heard to mutter under his breath “bloody awful people” at a gathered press pack during an official Clarence House photocall at the Swiss ski resort of Klosters.

 

 

The heir to the throne’s mumbles, in which he revealed a particular dislike for BBC correspondent Nicholas Witchell, were picked up on microphones buried in the snow.

 

About Witchell, he remarked: “I can’t bear that man anyway. He’s so awful, he really is.”

 

Paddy Harverson, Clarence House’s communication secretary, said the Prince regretted taking his “general frustration” out on Mr Witchell.

 

Mr Harverson said: “Nicholas was in the firing line when the Prince was expressing his general frustration at the paparazzi and it boiled over at the first person to ask a question.

 

“It wasn’t personal. He does regret saying it. He really didn’t mean to take it out on Nicholas.”

 

Asked whether the Prince was going to apologise, he added: “We’re not going to go into that.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good for Prince Charles. It was about time a Royal broke with protocol and had an opinion heard in public. After all, the press seem to report public opinion on him so what could be wrong with putting the boot on the other foot and giving the press a swift kick in the backside?

 

A person can only put up with so much before they break, this is what the press wanted and now they have got it. Only hope that Charles has thicker skin than they have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Video link here

 

Doesn't matter anyway. Charles has lost it and so it seems has William - the throne i.e. - because here (as the soon to be eldest son) is the next but one king - Tom Parker Bowles with his mother the next queen, Camilla

 

_345129_bowles300.jpg

 

From drugs item

May '99: The Prince of Wales was reported to have telephoned his godson Tom Parker Bowles and given him a severe scolding over newspaper claims that he had taken cocaine.

 

Great!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not the sniffing it's the getting caught.

The Royals should take drugs just like everyone else anyway.

 

Having seen the Osbornes on telly and then seen the antics of the Royal Family I can only conclude that they are all the same. Fact is that if we were getting the media attention these people are getting, most of us would be caught doing something that could make newspaper headlines!!! :ph34r:

 

Oh, and I think the Duke of Edinburgh is cool, must be on drugs or something but has yet to be caught. Great value entertainment, I would love to have him as an after dinner speaker. If only his wife would let him :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Queen Elizabeth II

  According to rumours going round British

  newsrooms, the Queen has got a serious illness

  and may not be long for this world - hence the

  rushed Charles-Camilla marriage to prepare him

  for the throne. But we hope that, like her

  gin-pickled Mum, Liz continues to defy the

  Grim Reaper for another few decades.

 

PopBitch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Queen Elizabeth II

   According to rumours going round British

   newsrooms, the Queen has got a serious illness

   and may not be long for this world - hence the

   rushed Charles-Camilla marriage to prepare him

   for the throne. But we hope that, like her

   gin-pickled Mum, Liz continues to defy the

   Grim Reaper for another few decades.

 

PopBitch

 

Maybe she's just so hacked off with it all she's fed up and looking to retire. Thinking to herself "let that lazy little sod find out what it's like to do some hard work and see where he finds the time for showing himself up with old buggers like Camillla."

 

Of course after Charles's little gem about Nicholas Witchell, she's probebly terrified that he's turning into his father. Every man's son dreads the day this happens too, but all too often it's futile to try and avoid it. It's nature at it's worst.

 

I don't think anything is going to prepare Charles for the throne if he isn't already prepared by now. As for Camilla??? I'm sure she's just lovely, but as Queen of England? Wouldn't really wish to have her as a Great Aunt. You know the one you only have to see once a year or so. But as Queen of England you would have to see her almost everyday on your telly and in the newspapers.

 

Still, love is blind. Can't deny them happiness if this is what they want. But I think QEII still has a fair wind in her sails, if you know what I mean ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All ceremonies and rituals are daft - and therefore we don't need ceremonial and ritual Heads of States.

 

What an incredibly stupid remark. What is there to say after such a crass statement, except perhaps to ask why people bother with funerals? Just shove your dead friends and relatives into the nearest binbag or toss 'em off a cliff. Anything more complex or time-consuming is just plain daft - according to Simple Simon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All ceremonies and rituals are daft - and therefore we don't need ceremonial and ritual Heads of States.

 

What an incredibly stupid remark. What is there to say after such a crass statement, except perhaps to ask why people bother with funerals? Just shove your dead friends and relatives into the nearest binbag or toss 'em off a cliff. Anything more complex or time-consuming is just plain daft - according to Simple Simon.

 

When it comes to my funeral I would not be offended if you shove me in a bin bag etc. Frankly, I'll be dead. And I won't care. Ritual and Ceremony is not for everyone and I don't think anyone should feel 'obliged' to participate in any ceremony if they don't want to.

 

The effort that goes into such occasions, not to mention the expense, could be used in much more imaginative ways and to the benefit of many people. Now that's complex and time consuming, and not daft, but practicle. What could be wrong with that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funerals are for the living, not the dead. They give you something to do after a loved one has died. Better than sitting around in grief. Especially if it's a spouse or a child who's died. It's selfish to tell people how to behave after you've died. That's up to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Queen Elizabeth II

   According to rumours going round British

   newsrooms, the Queen has got a serious illness

   and may not be long for this world - hence the

   rushed Charles-Camilla marriage to prepare him

   for the throne. But we hope that, like her

   gin-pickled Mum, Liz continues to defy the

   Grim Reaper for another few decades.

Total crapulence.

 

I suspect that Liz has told Chas that he is never going to be the the most over-subscribed pensioner on the planet so he might as well stop Camilla nagging him over his NI subscriptions by giving her legal rights to continue exploiting the peasants in Kernow.

-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...