Albert Tatlock Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 The most obvious way to deal with this problem, as it was in the past, would be to rename Sellafield again. 'Harmless' or 'Cuddly' sound far nicer names. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pongo Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 Ah, yes pongo that will be the ideal world you're talking about wouldn't it? In an ideal world we would tell ourselves on an individual level that we should reproduce less and consume less and then carry that out. Like many idealistic principles, the real life scenario and the ideal are poles apart. My insight into all this is a son doing a M.Eng in electrical engineering at the moment. Opinion there is that unless something is done in the next year or three, lights will be going out and factories will be stopping. You may regard that as a good thing, self limiting the problem but I doubt (just for example) the dialysis patient would see things the same way Are you worried about climate change or are you worried that resources are running out ? You seem to be on two different scenarios. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballaughbiker Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 I think climate change will really start to impact long before resources run out although the two problems are not unconnected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.