Jump to content

More Room For Government


crumlin

Recommended Posts

I don't think the gripe is the fact that they have the company, it's that they get planning permission to build a load of houses aimed at first time buyers / young families, and then buy them themselves.

 

Although I don't know all the facts, and I'm sure they haven't broken any laws so that makes it all ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then don't offer them any credit. With credit comes risk, it's how you assess the likelihood and impact that determines whether you extend it to them. And that's a decision for the creditors to take themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont really understand the concern about Dandara having a Panamanian holding company?
The question was asked in Tynwald on March 22nd;

 

The Hon Member for Michael (Mr Cannan) to ask the Chief Minister -

(1) Is it the policy of your Government to have major business involvement with companies involved with construction and residential development on the Island, whose holding company is registered in Panama; and

 

(2) in the event of closure or insolvency, what protection is there to creditors of such companies?

The concern seems to be the second part of the question.

 

What prompted the question is a mystery to me. Only things I can think are a combination of;

 

IOM Gvt should be looking to locally registered companies for financial involvement and

 

The Isle of Man has thousands of non resident companies registered here, (I can only guess that) Panamas regulations are not as transparent as ours.

 

It would seem ironic that Government spends millions trying to attract inward investment then (alledgedly) involves itself financially with a company registered in an alternative (and presumabley competing) offshore jurisdiction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WSAG it is quite obvious why there would be a concern. If the IOM wing of the Company got into trouble the Creditors would have no protection if all their assets were held in a holding Company in a far off land.

 

I thinks a bit rich of people in the Isle of Man to start complaining about tax efficient holding structures with thin capitalisation when this is a widespread use of IOM companies for holding non-IOM properties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is probably a raging debate on a Panamanian web forum right now. Squabbling about how well a popular development company is doing and how 'dodgy' it is that it has a holding company in some little financial backwater called the Isle of Man.......

 

Like them or not, this particular company has done extremely well at what it set out to do. And with success comes envy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like them or not, this particular company has done extremely well at what it set out to do.  And with success comes envy.

 

Yes exactly...I am sure that were struggling developers/tradesmen to suddenly become very big and profitable that they would act altruistically and pay all the tax that they could!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

;)

I dont really understand the concern about Dandara having a Panamanian holding company?
The question was asked in Tynwald on March 22nd;

 

The Hon Member for Michael (Mr Cannan) to ask the Chief Minister -

(1) Is it the policy of your Government to have major business involvement with companies involved with construction and residential development on the Island, whose holding company is registered in Panama; and

 

(2) in the event of closure or insolvency, what protection is there to creditors of such companies?

The concern seems to be the second part of the question.

 

What prompted the question is a mystery to me. Only things I can think are a combination of;

 

IOM Gvt should be looking to locally registered companies for financial involvement and

 

The Isle of Man has thousands of non resident companies registered here, (I can only guess that) Panamas regulations are not as transparent as ours.

 

It would seem ironic that Government spends millions trying to attract inward investment then (alledgedly) involves itself financially with a company registered in an alternative (and presumabley competing) offshore jurisdiction.

 

Maybe someone was trying to track down a company owned by MHKs that have property interests that may be a bit shaddy ;):P

 

Trouble is when the company is moved to Navada USA from Panama, you then have now chance of checking out the Directors/Owners ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trouble is when the company is moved to Navada USA from Panama, you then have now chance of checking out the Directors/Owners ;)

 

Oh I don't know, seems pretty well surveyed to me:-

 

post-72-1113412100_thumb.jpg post-72-1113412126_thumb.jpg post-72-1113412158_thumb.jpg

 

Look, there's even a map:-

 

post-72-1113412215_thumb.jpg

 

Be careful though, they don't like strangers round these parts:-

 

post-72-1113412261_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...