somewhatdamaged Posted October 9, 2011 Share Posted October 9, 2011 Anyone else got this? I bought it for the PC, and it looks good, but the texture quality really isn't up to scratch. It appears the Xbox, PS3 and PC all share the same textures. However, Carmack did hint at a high resolution texture pack that would most likely be pushing 100GB in size. I can only hope he does decide to release it, as the game could look superb with it For anyone with both consoles who is unsure as to which platform to purchase it on, see this quote from Eurogamer.net " In terms of the consoles, the purchase recommendation is very straightforward: Rage is an easy win for the Xbox 360" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tribz Posted October 9, 2011 Share Posted October 9, 2011 Seriously ... GTX 580 SLI beat by 360? I'm playing it on 6870 crossfire. Textures look great on latest update (today) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
somewhatdamaged Posted October 9, 2011 Author Share Posted October 9, 2011 PC version looks the best of course (as you would expect!) but it's still the same textures as the console version. Disappointing That being said, the technology they have used to maintain a solid 60fps on the consoles is extremely impressive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twonky Posted October 9, 2011 Share Posted October 9, 2011 Use a super-duper config file, innit. http://www.geforce.com/News/articles/how-to-unlock-rages-high-resolution-textures-with-a-few-simple-tweaks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
somewhatdamaged Posted October 10, 2011 Author Share Posted October 10, 2011 Already done that, the textures are still pretty naff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tribz Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 Yeah that didnt really work for me either. Latest AMD Rage Preview drivers improved it and the latest update has video settings now at last. I do think it looks stunning out in the Wasteland and Wellspring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K.os Theory Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 looks and plays great on the 360, pity i don't have the room on my HDD to install but to be honest i'm not noticing that much texture pop-in. it's a remarkable achievement from id to get it running at 60fps and looking the way it does! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supermac82 Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 Playing this myself at the mo on PS3. Excellent game, really enjoying it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tribz Posted October 22, 2011 Share Posted October 22, 2011 Coolermaster HAFX|2600K@5Ghz-H20|Asus P8P67 Pro B3 Sorry for off topic but what voltage are you putting through your 2600K to get 5GHz? I'm putting 1.4V through to get 4.6GHz on a Corsair H70 Liquid Cooler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
somewhatdamaged Posted October 23, 2011 Author Share Posted October 23, 2011 1.47 in bios, dropping to 1.45 with vdroop. But i'm on water remember, i had a H70 and there was no way i was getting 5Ghz You shouldn't need more than 1.32v to get 4.6ghz on a 2600K (especially with the decent cooler you have) - unless you have an extraordinarily bad chip that is! You can actually get 4.5ghz by just changing the multiplier and not even bother touching any other settings. It's best to try and get it lower though as the auto setting tends to overvolt. What temps are you getting with Prime 95 (blend) or Intel Burn Test? I was hitting 79-80 degrees with my H70 at 4.8Ghz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tribz Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 Think I've been a little unlucky with this chip. I'm back down to 4.4GHz stable but I have to put 1.34v through. Prime blend temps are mid 60's. I'm manually tuning rather than auto overclocking. CPU Load line calibration which I think is V Droop is set to Level 2 so voltage shouldnt drop too much. To get stable at 4.6, I had to put 1.42 volts through and prime temps were in high seventies and touched 80. To get 4.8, I think i'll need around 1.45-1.47 which I think is a bit too high. Prime is definately going to be in the 80's Seems a lot of people get same or better clocks at lower voltage so its probably this chip. Board is an Asrock Fatality P67 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
somewhatdamaged Posted October 23, 2011 Author Share Posted October 23, 2011 Yeah could just be a poor chip i guess. I set everything to extreme or high then just set the cpu voltage. It's pretty easy overclocking these Sandybridge chips though, certainly easier than the socket 1366 chips Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twonky Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 Don't be such girls! My overclocked i7-920 hits the high 80s in the Intel burn test, and it hasn't caught fire yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebees Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 Like I was saying to MrBees "Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeegt ecca ecca ecca Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" I remember when alls you needed to play a computer game was a tape machine with skinny head phone sockets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tribz Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 Don't be such girls! My overclocked i7-920 hits the high 80s in the Intel burn test, and it hasn't caught fire yet :-p My rig is already heating the room with its temps ETA. the perceived wisdom is that the thinner silicon of Sandybridge is not good with higher voltage. How true this is, I'm not sure! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.