New World Order

[HeliX]

 

 

There's only so much resources that a world can comfortable live off and it seems that we're hell bent on over populating the lands and increasingly destroying agricultural land to make way for buildings and so called progress.

 

The problem is, is that the world needs to reduce it's population and whether this would be done by the NWO or by a countries own controls

 

Is this really true? That the world's limit is really 7 billion people or whatever it is.

 

It would seem sensible that we need to adopt a less resource intensive lifestyle but the case for a cull is not conclusive imho. (this view might justify lots of self appointed Dexters running around)

 

If there is a need for a cull, who should decide and how? That decision is not one for governments imho - they fuck everything else up so they cannot be trusted with that decision.

 

You could use less resources by getting rid of your computer and internet connection.

[CrossRoss]

 

 

 

There's only so much resources that a world can comfortable live off and it seems that we're hell bent on over populating the lands and increasingly destroying agricultural land to make way for buildings and so called progress.

 

The problem is, is that the world needs to reduce it's population and whether this would be done by the NWO or by a countries own controls

 

Is this really true? That the world's limit is really 7 billion people or whatever it is.

 

It would seem sensible that we need to adopt a less resource intensive lifestyle but the case for a cull is not conclusive imho. (this view might justify lots of self appointed Dexters running around)

 

If there is a need for a cull, who should decide and how? That decision is not one for governments imho - they fuck everything else up so they cannot be trusted with that decision.

 

You could use less resources by getting rid of your computer and internet connection.

 

Chris Robertshaw ?? Is that you Chris ??