Jump to content

Steam Packet Warns Of Disruption To Sailings


Amadeus

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, woolley said:

Looking like our quoted cost is too low then. Expect more hikes. Why the hell are WE paying for this? Will we also be paying ourselves outrageous harbour charges to use it when it's in operation?  Crazy stuff. 

How is permanently securing our ferry access to UK crazy? It's crazy not to!!

And you expect not to pay? Hello? If peel paid for the new berth (Lord knows why they would) but if they did, how do you think they'd recover their costs? And we'd have f all to show for it.

Plus if it's ours, we could potentially charge berthing fees to other operators?

Long term strategically for the island, it's exactly the right move. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, b4mbi said:

How is permanently securing our ferry access to UK crazy? It's crazy not to!!

And you expect not to pay? Hello? If peel paid for the new berth (Lord knows why they would) but if they did, how do you think they'd recover their costs? And we'd have f all to show for it.

Plus if it's ours, we could potentially charge berthing fees to other operators?

Long term strategically for the island, it's exactly the right move. 

All laudable stuff, but you know deep down that we will have been hoodwinked again and we will pay dearly for time immemorial.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peel Ports exist for one reason. To make money. They hold no allegiance to the IOM and if they can reap greater income from their facilities than they make from the SP they will make those facilities available to those alternative sources of income. It drives home how insignificant we and our ferry operation really are in the great scheme of things.

It therefore makes sense to have our own facility. The cost remains open to question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Non-Believer said:

Peel Ports exist for one reason. To make money. They hold no allegiance to the IOM and if they can reap greater income from their facilities than they make from the SP they will make those facilities available to those alternative sources of income. It drives home how insignificant we and our ferry operation really are in the great scheme of things.

It therefore makes sense to have our own facility. The cost remains open to question.

But we will end up paying two or three times more than in the UK, oh I forgot it is in the UK still IOM "tax" will still be applied.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, finlo said:

But we will end up paying two or three times more than in the UK, oh I forgot it is in the UK still IOM "tax" will still be applied.

It's interesting to look back at how this was to be funded from the outset and how the cost has risen. From a reported initial PP contribution/build of £15M to an IoM taxpayer cost of £30M. I'd bet that won't be the final figure though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Non-Believer said:

It's interesting to look back at how this was to be funded from the outset and how the cost has risen. From a reported initial PP contribution/build of £15M to an IoM taxpayer cost of £30M. I'd bet that won't be the final figure though.

Well the contract was awarded after a tender process so one assumes the price being paid is there or thereabouts.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...