Jump to content

Steam Packet Warns Of Disruption To Sailings


Amadeus

Recommended Posts

looks as tho it also had difficulty with docking at Heysham today - according to the webpage it left 6min late but arrived 49min late (after my own experience with Manxman a month ago I no longer trust these figures tho as I suspect they are based on planned but not real times).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Frances said:

looks as tho it also had difficulty with docking at Heysham today - according to the webpage it left 6min late but arrived 49min late (after my own experience with Manxman a month ago I no longer trust these figures tho as I suspect they are based on planned but not real times).
 

There's been a lot of activity in & around Heysham the last few days with dredgers, so it's possible that they had to wait for other vessels to move out the way to allow sufficient room for MX to enter & manoeuver. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, swoopy2110 said:

Another amount of great forward planning by those responsible. Why are these alterations being done after the vessel has already been here for 4 months and going into a time period where the weather is obviously going to be worse? Rather than having them done before she arrived.

It's a good question and one that has been asked before without answer.  The DoI only applied for planning in July 2022 (received October) and getting specialist contractors would take longer.  That explains why it's costing £6 million rather than the £3.25 million originally projected.

Construction of the Manxman only started in August 2021.  There's a long gap in the timeline for most of that year, which will be partly explained by Covid slowing down the yard's construction line (they were chosen the previous year), but it also suggests they were finalising the actual plans for the boat.  The new CEO was announced in May and it's not clear how much influence he had over this - or indeed the Government in general had after the takeover in May 2018.  But both are certainly possible.

You would have expected the general dimensions and so on of the boat would have been finalised fairly on in the process and those passed on the DoI Harbours to assess if the new boat would be able to operate with the existing infrastructure and draw up plans to cope if not.  So either this wasn't done, or the relevant specifications weren't finalised.  The recent dispute makes me wonder just at what stage the extra crew accommodation was added and who was behind the new boat being larger with all the subsequent consequences.

Now DoI Harbours seems to have been rather rudderless.  The previous Director of Harbours retired early in April 2022 and he wasn't replaced till this January (by another ship registry person) and that seems only to be a temporary appointment.  And there was no permanent DoI CEO.  So assessing how the new boat would operate might have gone in the "too hard to think about" pile (did Chris Thomas's arrival in June 2022 get things moving?).  Or it may be that the specifications of the boat still hadn't been finalised and that was a good excuse to do nothing.  Or both.  But the whole thing certainly does show the way things seem to be left to the last minute - and the costs of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Kopek said:

I don't know anything about Boats but can it's  manoeuvrability and side wind susceptibility be overcome, eventually, with more trials and experience?

With its upper structure being so big I would say it’s always going to be problematic. Wouldn’t like to berth her with strong gusting winds . 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, english zloty said:

Seems the SP has a modern Titanic on its hands. Perhaps less chance of hypothermia if she went down in summer / less chance of stormy weather

Let’s build a massive big boat for £80M with not enough lifeboats. Said nobody ever outside of the IOM public sector. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...