manxst Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 1 minute ago, dilligaf said: Thread derail is not respectful You didn’t mention that when replying to the ‘de horse’ post? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annoymouse Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 22 minutes ago, dilligaf said: Doc, if humour offends, the offended have the problem. 2 minutes ago, dilligaf said: Thread derail is not respectful !?!??! 😶 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 (edited) 4 minutes ago, manxst said: You didn’t mention that when replying to the ‘de horse’ post? Different strokes Edited January 17, 2021 by dilligaf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 9 minutes ago, dilligaf said: Different strokes Is this a witch hunt. I am no Ginny. Thank you. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTF Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 24 minutes ago, dilligaf said: Thread derail is not respectful the thread is mountain watch, naff all to do with st johns in the first place 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 2 minutes ago, WTF said: the thread is mountain watch, naff all to do with st johns in the first place Zzzzz. The same applies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxst Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 5 minutes ago, dilligaf said: Zzzzz. The same applies. Whopper. ‘Do as I say, not as I do’. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annoymouse Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 11 minutes ago, dilligaf said: Is this a witch hunt. I am no Ginny. Thank you. Stop calling out others for their behaviour when yours isn’t much better then. You consider a joke to be an acceptable ‘derail’ after a death has just been announced and then you have the audacity to call out a much more mild derail, then to top that off you try to play the victim card with this ‘Ginny’ comment. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doc.fixit Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 The joke followed on JW's defence comments. Methinks the lady protesteth too much. As I said , if it offends my most sincere apologies, however the thread was not about the terrible incident in the first place which was a derail in it's own right. In other words, if you are truly offended then the apologies are sincere. No other comment from me. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 5 minutes ago, Annoymouse said: Stop calling out others for their behaviour when yours isn’t much better then. You consider a joke to be an acceptable ‘derail’ after a death has just been announced and then you have the audacity to call out a much more mild derail, then to top that off you try to play the victim card with this ‘Ginny’ comment. The joke was fuck all to do with the sad event. It was to do with another derailment. You not understand that.? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 7 minutes ago, dilligaf said: The joke was fuck all to do with the sad event. It was to do with another derailment. You not understand that.? I reckon some on here are so shallow they could drown in a saucer of water. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annoymouse Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 3 minutes ago, dilligaf said: The joke was fuck all to do with the sad event. It was to do with another derailment. You not understand that.? No Dilli, it is you that doesn’t understand. Why do you consider one thread derail acceptable and another not acceptable? Please also be aware that your replies will continue to cause further derailment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 C'mon people, let it go... 1 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny F Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 What an awful tragedy, a young life cut short, rest in peace young man.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beelzebub3 Posted January 18, 2021 Share Posted January 18, 2021 On 1/16/2021 at 4:14 PM, horatiotheturd said: Rumours its to do with that stupid crossing thing on the heritage trail. If it is, whoever signed that thing off needs adding to the list of government cockwombles who need sacking. Never seen anything like it and have no idea how it was ever allowed. Gives pedestrians and cyclist a false sense of security and most traffic seems to pay no attention at all to it (i don't think legally they have to) I would like to do a skid test on it while wet, it certainly feels slippy when crossing in the damp, although that is only my opinion I am sure the DOI bods would have carried out a skid test before re-opening the road to traffic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.