CrossRoss Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 imagine 37k people have watched this some will think it is nonsense some will be unsure some will be motivated enough to do something say divide it up into thirds that is 12k people who are motivated enough to occupy a church or something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojomonkey Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 imagine 37k people have watched this some will think it is nonsense some will be unsure some will be motivated enough to do something say divide it up into thirds that is 12k people who are motivated enough to occupy a church or something imagine 1,369,266,745 people have watched this some will think it is nonsense some will be unsure some will be motivated enough to do something am I doing this right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonan3 Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 However tempted I may be, I won't do any name-calling or any unnecessary put downs on this occasion, but... ...the idea of of dividing it into thirds like that is, shall we say, a bit over optimistic? In reality, at least half of that number will have switched to something more to their taste before the end. Of the 50% that leaves (and that's a very optimistic figure), at least half will have dismissed it as a load of nonsense; many more will have simply wondered what was the point of it, and many will be - as you said - unsure. At best, there will be no more than a handful of people who will actually have been so impressed by it that they'll be motivated to do anything other than use it as a topic of conversation. I mean, be honest - are you going to 'occupy a church or something' because of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrighty Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 In reality, at least half of that number will have switched to something more to their taste before the end. Of the 50% that leaves (and that's a very optimistic figure), at least half will have dismissed it as a load of nonsense; many more will have simply wondered what was the point of it, and many will be - as you said - unsure. At best, there will be no more than a handful of people who will actually have been so impressed by it that they'll be motivated to do anything other than use it as a topic of conversation. I mean, be honest - are you going to 'occupy a church or something' because of it? That video is an hour and 23 minutes long. I managed 14 seconds before quitting. I suspect that is probably not unusual. So 37K? Probably just CrossRoss and one other fruitcake have seen the whole thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
credente Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 That video is an hour and 23 minutes long. I managed 14 seconds before quitting. I admire your persistence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Jefferson Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 In reality, at least half of that number will have switched to something more to their taste before the end. Of the 50% that leaves (and that's a very optimistic figure), at least half will have dismissed it as a load of nonsense; many more will have simply wondered what was the point of it, and many will be - as you said - unsure. At best, there will be no more than a handful of people who will actually have been so impressed by it that they'll be motivated to do anything other than use it as a topic of conversation. I mean, be honest - are you going to 'occupy a church or something' because of it? That video is an hour and 23 minutes long. I managed 14 seconds before quitting. I suspect that is probably not unusual. So 37K? Probably just CrossRoss and one other fruitcake have seen the whole thing. I skipped to 11 minutes and 48 minutes into the video, and he's interviewing a transvestite. WTF is this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrossRoss Posted March 2, 2013 Share Posted March 2, 2013 I skipped to 11 minutes and 48 minutes into the video, and he's interviewing a transvestite. WTF is this? perhaps next time you are in a kangaroo court you could ask the bloke in the wig and dress what the fuck he thinks he is doing? but then the tranny in a crown (kangaroo) court derives their authority from an unelected freak some people call a benefits scrounger, some call her the queen, she "claims" her authority from God. Of course that bollocks is soooooooooooooo much more convincing than Kevin Annett's lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amadeus Posted March 3, 2013 Author Share Posted March 3, 2013 I skipped to 11 minutes and 48 minutes into the video, and he's interviewing a transvestite. WTF is this? perhaps next time you are in a kangaroo court you could ask the bloke in the wig and dress what the fuck he thinks he is doing? but then the tranny in a crown (kangaroo) court derives their authority from an unelected freak some people call a benefits scrounger, some call her the queen, she "claims" her authority from God. Of course that bollocks is soooooooooooooo much more convincing than Kevin Annett's lot. Haven't read much on the origins of today's legal system in England then, have you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxman1980 Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 I skipped to 11 minutes and 48 minutes into the video, and he's interviewing a transvestite. WTF is this? perhaps next time you are in a kangaroo court you could ask the bloke in the wig and dress what the fuck he thinks he is doing? but then the tranny in a crown (kangaroo) court derives their authority from an unelected freak some people call a benefits scrounger, some call her the queen, she "claims" her authority from God. Of course that bollocks is soooooooooooooo much more convincing than Kevin Annett's lot. Haven't read much on the origins of today's legal system in England then, have you? CrossRoss has never bothered doing any real research let alone considering how the legal system emerged.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrossRoss Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 Haven't read much on the origins of today's legal system in England then, have you? You appear to be able to enlighten me on where you read that the Isle of Man is a part of England. There are large numbers of people who are seeking justice and have given up on the regular system and are now backing another system which they believe is more likely to give them truth and justice. Perhaps you should familiarise yourself with the Bogside massacre of 1972 (bloody sunday) and the Widgery Tribunal which attempted to sanitise murder and prevent justice and truth. True the Saville inquiry attempted to put things right 26 years late and David Cameron apologised. For a manx example you could use the "trial" of Iliam Dhone where the jury had to be nobbled to get the "correct" verdict, even the firing squad knew they were murdering an innocent man and only one man hit the target out of a squad of 6. the motto just because a tranny in a wig and dress tells you something does not trump your own experience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxman1980 Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 Haven't read much on the origins of today's legal system in England then, have you? You appear to be able to enlighten me on where you read that the Isle of Man is a part of England. I must have missed the point where you were making allegations about people who would be subjected to trial on the Isle of Man.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amadeus Posted March 4, 2013 Author Share Posted March 4, 2013 You appear t....................... I don't really subscribe to your anarchist views, because that's what it would boil down to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norseman Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 imagine 37k people have watched this some will be motivated enough to do something Watch out CrossRoss, that Annett is an ex priest you know? Bet he's not letting on about everything that went on before he was kicked out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonan3 Posted March 8, 2013 Share Posted March 8, 2013 The cardinals have all arrived to elect the next pope. It's called a 'conclave' and apparently its a bit like a Trekkies convention - only with fewer people who are celibate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Jefferson Posted March 9, 2013 Share Posted March 9, 2013 The cardinals have all arrived to elect the next pope. It's called a 'conclave' and apparently its a bit like a Trekkies convention - only with fewer people who are celibate. Let's hope the Illuminati don't try anything. I watched Angels & Demons last night -- quite possibly the cheesiest, most "Americanesque", idiotic films of all time. Actually, up until it emerged that Ewan McGregor had invented the Illuminati threat as part of a plot to be elected Pope, I was rooting for them to win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.