MilitantDogOwner Posted May 15, 2013 Author Share Posted May 15, 2013 http://www.newschannel5.com/story/22240628/tullahoma-father-charged-after-child-shot "Tullahoma Police Chief Paul Blackwell said police see this type of incident far too often. He said owners need to be very careful when cleaning or handling their guns. "Don't check once, check twice, and understand the mechanics of your weapon, " said Chief Blackwell. "A lot of problems happen when people aren't familiar with how their weapon works." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Jefferson Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MilitantDogOwner Posted May 18, 2013 Author Share Posted May 18, 2013 Picture of the Queen Hmmmm I wonder what the Queen's invasion army would be worried about, the US Armed Forces with an annual budget in excess of $600 billion and a trained strength of just over 2 million personnel or.....armed civilians who are more likely to kill themselves and each other. If anything America was more likely to invade the UK than the other way around (War Plan Red). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Jefferson Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 Picture of the Queen Hmmmm I wonder what the Queen's invasion army would be worried about, the US Armed Forces with an annual budget in excess of $600 billion and a trained strength of just over 2 million personnel or.....armed civilians who are more likely to kill themselves and each other. If anything America was more likely to invade the UK than the other way around (War Plan Red). I think you missed the point. If it wasn't for gun rights, the United States would have been defeated by the army of George III. The Queen wouldn't need to have invaded the United States; she'd have inherited it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MilitantDogOwner Posted May 18, 2013 Author Share Posted May 18, 2013 Picture of the Queen Hmmmm I wonder what the Queen's invasion army would be worried about, the US Armed Forces with an annual budget in excess of $600 billion and a trained strength of just over 2 million personnel or.....armed civilians who are more likely to kill themselves and each other. If anything America was more likely to invade the UK than the other way around (War Plan Red). I think you missed the point. If it wasn't for gun rights, the United States would have been defeated by the army of George III. The Queen wouldn't need to have invaded the United States; she'd have inherited it. History lesson time: The American Revolutionary War (you know the one they fought against the British, led by King George the Third) ended in 1783 with the Treaty of Paris. The Second Amendment to the Declaration of Independent was added to the bill in 1791. 8 years after American had won the War of Independence. "Gun rights" had nothing to with the defeat of King George the Third. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Jefferson Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 History lesson time: The American Revolutionary War (you know the one they fought against the British, led by King George the Third) ended in 1783 with the Treaty of Paris. The Second Amendment to the Declaration of Independent was added to the bill in 1791. 8 years after American had won the War of Independence. "Gun rights" had nothing to with the defeat of King George the Third. Real History lesson time: Yes it did. They could never have kicked the British out without their guns. Also, there were several wars with Britain well into the 1800s. The British burned down the White House and the US Capitol in 1814, Sherlock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MilitantDogOwner Posted May 18, 2013 Author Share Posted May 18, 2013 Picture of the Queen Hmmmm I wonder what the Queen's invasion army would be worried about, the US Armed Forces with an annual budget in excess of $600 billion and a trained strength of just over 2 million personnel or.....armed civilians who are more likely to kill themselves and each other. If anything America was more likely to invade the UK than the other way around (War Plan Red). I think you missed the point. If it wasn't for gun rights, the United States would have been defeated by the army of George III. The Queen wouldn't need to have invaded the United States; she'd have inherited it. History lesson time: The American Revolutionary War (you know the one they fought against the British, led by King George the Third) ended in 1783 with the Treaty of Paris. The Second Amendment to the Declaration of Independent was added to the bill in 1791. 8 years after American had won the War of Independence. "Gun rights" had nothing to with the defeat of King George the Third. Yes it did. They could never have kicked the British out without their guns. Also, there were several wars with Britain well into the 1800s. The British burned down the White House in 1812, Sherlock. America had no "gun rights" until the 2nd Amendment was added. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Jefferson Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 America had no "gun rights" until the 2nd Amendment was added. What a load of nonsense. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights merely put into writing the inalienable rights which were already understood to be the natural rights of man. They did not create rights, they merely AFFIRMED them. They didn't just make them up on the spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MilitantDogOwner Posted May 18, 2013 Author Share Posted May 18, 2013 America had no "gun rights" until the 2nd Amendment was added. What a load of nonsense. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights merely put into writing the inalienable rights which were already understood to be the natural rights of man. They did not create rights, they merely AFFIRMED them. They didn't just make them up on the spot. By law, what right did the Americans have to bear arms, before it was affirmed by the 2nd Amendment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Jefferson Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 America had no "gun rights" until the 2nd Amendment was added. What a load of nonsense. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights merely put into writing the inalienable rights which were already understood to be the natural rights of man. They did not create rights, they merely AFFIRMED them. They didn't just make them up on the spot. By law, what right did the Americans have to bear arms, before it was affirmed by the 2nd Amendment? You seem to have difficulty understanding the difference between a RIGHT and a law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MilitantDogOwner Posted May 18, 2013 Author Share Posted May 18, 2013 You seem to have difficulty understanding the difference between a RIGHT and a law. A human right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Jefferson Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 You seem to have difficulty understanding the difference between a RIGHT and a law. A human right? No, a natural and inalienable right of man (and woman). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MilitantDogOwner Posted May 18, 2013 Author Share Posted May 18, 2013 You seem to have difficulty understanding the difference between a RIGHT and a law. A human right? No, a natural and inalienable right of man (and woman). All men and women? And what defines a right as natural and inalienable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Jefferson Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 You seem to have difficulty understanding the difference between a RIGHT and a law. A human right? No, a natural and inalienable right of man (and woman). All men and women? And what defines a right as natural and inalienable? Jesus Christ, you're dense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MilitantDogOwner Posted May 18, 2013 Author Share Posted May 18, 2013 Jesus Christ, you're dense. Nope, just letting you dig yourself even deeper. So go on does your "right" for every man/woman to bear arms include all peoples of all races/creeds/religions/sexuality/etc? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.