Endovelicus Posted July 4, 2013 Author Share Posted July 4, 2013 she's a dyke. I think you may be a little bit too tall for your blood supply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josem Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Saying that Julia Gillard was sacked because of sexism is simply untrue. The fact of the matter is that she was unreservedly incompetent, made a whole series of bad decisions, and was simply a bad Prime Minister. It's worth noting that her replacement's popularity amongst women has substantially increased. The article linked in the original post of this thread has very little relationship with reality, and given the author's close connection with Gillard, it can be almost entirely discounted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ruger Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Testing... just wondering why I cant post in the NSA thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moghrey Mie Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 Saying that Julia Gillard was sacked because of sexism is simply untrue. The fact of the matter is that she was unreservedly incompetent, made a whole series of bad decisions, and was simply a bad Prime Minister. It's worth noting that her replacement's popularity amongst women has substantially increased. The article linked in the original post of this thread has very little relationship with reality, and given the author's close connection with Gillard, it can be almost entirely discounted. http://www.allenandunwin.com/default.aspx?page=94&book=9781742379227 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Jefferson Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La_Dolce_Vita Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 Didn't Rudd gets the words 'suppository' and 'repository' mixed it last week? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La_Dolce_Vita Posted August 16, 2013 Share Posted August 16, 2013 Didn't Rudd gets the words 'suppository' and 'repository' mixed it last week? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La_Dolce_Vita Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 Oops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endovelicus Posted September 7, 2013 Author Share Posted September 7, 2013 Delighted to see that the Ruddites got exactly what they deserved - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-24000133 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La_Dolce_Vita Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 What did they deserve? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endovelicus Posted September 8, 2013 Author Share Posted September 8, 2013 The back-stabbing misogynistic bastards got dumped out of office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La_Dolce_Vita Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 Because of how they treated Gillard? Who is more liberal of Rudd and Gillard though? What I find interesting is that Rudd apparently supports gay marriage. Yet Gillard seems to rely on her Christianity or others to support her stance that it should be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endovelicus Posted September 8, 2013 Author Share Posted September 8, 2013 The key word there is 'apparently.' Rudd will 'support' any cause that brings in a few votes - but whether he would ever act on it is quite another matter! At least with Gillard you could see what you were getting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La_Dolce_Vita Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 I see. As much as I detest her sympathy and identification with Christianity in her politics, she does seem less childish than so many of the Australian politicians I have read about on occasions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josem Posted September 15, 2013 Share Posted September 15, 2013 I see. As much as I detest her sympathy and identification with Christianity in her politics, she does seem less childish than so many of the Australian politicians I have read about on occasions. This doesn't make any sense. Julia Gillard was Australia's first self-identifying athiest Prime Minister. Here's a link confirming this: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/pm-tells-it-as-she-sees-it-on-the-god-issue-20100629-zjad.html It seems that it would be better to judge her on the quality of her ideas or the content of her character, rather than her religious beliefs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.