Lxxx Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 "Chemicals in toothpaste and soap could be behind drop in male fertility, scientists claim." Researchers have found that around a third of the 'non-toxic' chemicals used in everyday items can dramatically affect the potency of sperm cells, leading to a rise in infertility. The study is the first to find a direct link between common man-made chemicals and a decline in the potency of human sperm. http://www.express.co.uk/news/health/475479/Chemicals-in-toothpaste-and-soap-could-be-behind-drop-in-male-fertility-scientists-claim Could is a very big word when used in headlines like that. I can't get that link to open, I suspect the actually level of scientific fact in an article from The Express might be somewhat limited anyway. Is it anything like the usual Daily Mail type story linking everything to causing cancer? That's because pretty much everything in the western way of living does contribute to cancer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonan3 Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3643656/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbie Bobster Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 "Could chemicals in toothpaste and soap be behind drop in male fertility?" "Any tabloid headline that is expressed as a question can be answered by 'No'" - Richard Bacon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Jefferson Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 We all know how rich and powerful the corporations are who push all this poison on us. Obviously they don't want to get sued by stating it as a fact. Can you imagine the lawsuits if they actually admitted they'd been poisoning us for the last 50 odd years???? The writing is already on the wall for anyone who has a brain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lxxx Posted May 13, 2014 Share Posted May 13, 2014 You mean the same corporations who told us cigarettes were safe for decades, with government complicity....?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truth Seeker Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Health fears over BPA chemical in plastic food packaging. "In France the decision has been taken to ban BPA from food packaging from 1 January 2015 as a result of health fears." http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-29631355 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Posted October 23, 2014 Author Share Posted October 23, 2014 As like the US, Ireland is also receiving grants from the local agenda 21 fund. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted October 23, 2014 Share Posted October 23, 2014 That's because pretty much everything in the western way of living does contribute to cancer. Particularly longevity. Gotta die of something with a mortality rate of 100%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truth Seeker Posted November 10, 2014 Share Posted November 10, 2014 Catholic Doctors Speak: Tetanus vaccination campaign is all about population control. "Our concern and the subject of this discussion is the WHO/UNICEF sponsored tetanus immunization campaign launched last year in October ostensibly to eradicate neonatal tetanus. It is targeted at girls and women between the ages of 14 49 (child bearing age) and in 60 specific districts spread all around the country. The tetanus vaccine being used in this campaign has been imported into the country specifically for this purpose and bears a different batch number from the regular TT vaccine. So far, 3 doses have been given the first in October 2013, the second in March 2014 and the third in October 2014. It is highly possible that there are two more doses to go. Giving five doses of tetanus vaccination every 6 months is not usual or the recommended regime for tetanus vaccination. The only time tetanus vaccine has been given in five doses is when it is used as a carrier in fertility regulating vaccines laced with the pregnancy hormone - Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) developed by WHO in 1992. When tetanus is laced with HCG and administered in five doses every 6 months, the woman develops antibodies against both the tetanus and the HCG in 2 3 years after the last injection. Once a mother develops antibodies against HCG, she rejects any pregnancy as soon as it starts growing in her womb thus causing repeated abortions and subsequent sterility." Catholic Doctors Speak: Tetanus vaccination campaign is all about population control. http://www.matercare.org/news-publications/latest-news/catholic-doctors-speak-tetanus-vaccination-campaign-is-all-about-population-control/ UN organizations sterilizing millions of girls & women under cover of an anti-tetanus vaccination program in Kenya. http://www.sott.net/article/288628-UN-organizations-sterilizing-millions-of-girls-women-under-cover-of-an-anti-tetanus-vaccination-program-in-Kenya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Jefferson Posted November 10, 2014 Share Posted November 10, 2014 Catholic Church policy on contraception is also about population control -- the deliberate encouraging of overpopulation in third world countries so they can push down global wages and keep the poor poor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giri Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 On 8/30/2013 at 9:53 AM, Thomas Jefferson said: Of course it's real. It's on the UN's own website: http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf It's a blueprint for mass population reduction and totalitarian control by world government. Well said but unfortunately most people are sheep and believe in the global warming scam etc. We need to get the facts out there before it's too late. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freggyragh Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 On 5/13/2014 at 8:41 PM, Lxxx said: You mean the same corporations who told us cigarettes were safe for decades, with government complicity....?? Those corporations told us tobacco was safe up until research proved otherwise by the mid 1960s. The government has made health warnings on tobacco products mandatory since 1971. The legal age for smoking in 1971 was 16, so you’d have to be 65 now to have ever legally smoked tobacco that didn’t come with a government health warning, or 85 to have possibly been told cigarettes were safe ‘for decades’ with government complicity. The truth is that the government acted fairly swiftly to get the message across, once the science was clear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 The first official report linking smoking, lung cancer and other harmful tobacco-related ailments was produced in 1912, confirming what many sensible people of the time had believed for decades. Murmurings about the health risks were heard from the mid 19th century. German research prior to world war 2 confirmed the health risks and from 1939-45, the Nazi party issued public health warnings against the perils of smoking. Hitler banned it from meetings and his 'table talks.' The science has been clear for centuries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.