Cameron Starts Banning Stuff On The Internet

[HeliX]

http://metro.co.uk/2013/11/17/rape-porn-possession-to-be-punished-by-three-years-in-jail-david-cameron-to-announce-4189512/

 

Wonder what's next.

 

Oh, that includes "simulated rape porn" by the way. So now you're all going to prison:

[manxy]

About time too!

[HeliX]

Is it?

 

Mark my words, next it'll be BDSM, then older/younger, then all porn. Slippery slope.

[manxy]

if you aren't into child abuse, then you'll have no problems with this part then?

[HeliX]

if you aren't into child abuse, then you'll have no problems with this part then?

Where is child abuse mentioned anywhere in that link?

[manxy]

 

if you aren't into child abuse, then you'll have no problems with this part then?

Where is child abuse mentioned anywhere in that link?

As quoted from your link - The prime minister has previously attacked websites which show the material, saying: ‘These images normalise sexual violence against women – and they are quite simply poisonous to the young people who see them.’

 

Forgot to add the line -

UPDATE: Google and Microsoft praised after agreeing to block child abuse images

[HeliX]

 

 

if you aren't into child abuse, then you'll have no problems with this part then?

Where is child abuse mentioned anywhere in that link?

As quoted from your link - The prime minister has previously attacked websites which show the material, saying: ‘These images normalise sexual violence against women – and they are quite simply poisonous to the young people who see them.’

So you're saying things that aren't appropriate for children are all child abuse?

So 18 rated films are child abuse?

All porn is child abuse? Best ban it.

[HeliX]

 

Forgot to add the line -

UPDATE: Google and Microsoft praised after agreeing to block child abuse images

But that's from a different story, isn't it? It's completely independent of this.

[manxy]

 

 

 

if you aren't into child abuse, then you'll have no problems with this part then?

Where is child abuse mentioned anywhere in that link?

As quoted from your link - The prime minister has previously attacked websites which show the material, saying: ‘These images normalise sexual violence against women – and they are quite simply poisonous to the young people who see them.’

So you're saying things that aren't appropriate for children are all child abuse?

So 18 rated films are child abuse?

All porn is child abuse? Best ban it.

It was you who brought the link up and said the following - (did you not?) Where is child abuse mentioned anywhere in that link?

I pointed out that your link did indeed have a glaring mention of child abuse in the link UPDATE: Google and Microsoft praised after agreeing to block child abuse images

I was pointing out that your comment was wrong

[manxy]

 

 

 

if you aren't into child abuse, then you'll have no problems with this part then?

Where is child abuse mentioned anywhere in that link?

As quoted from your link - The prime minister has previously attacked websites which show the material, saying: ‘These images normalise sexual violence against women – and they are quite simply poisonous to the young people who see them.’

So you're saying things that aren't appropriate for children are all child abuse?

So 18 rated films are child abuse?

All porn is child abuse? Best ban it.

So you're saying that it's ok for young children to watch 18 rated films?

[HeliX]

 

 

 

 

if you aren't into child abuse, then you'll have no problems with this part then?

Where is child abuse mentioned anywhere in that link?

As quoted from your link - The prime minister has previously attacked websites which show the material, saying: ‘These images normalise sexual violence against women – and they are quite simply poisonous to the young people who see them.’

So you're saying things that aren't appropriate for children are all child abuse?

So 18 rated films are child abuse?

All porn is child abuse? Best ban it.

So you're saying that it's ok for young children to watch 18 rated films?

I'm finding it difficult to discern whether you're being obtuse or you're actually this stupid.

[manxy]

 

 

 

 

 

if you aren't into child abuse, then you'll have no problems with this part then?

Where is child abuse mentioned anywhere in that link?

As quoted from your link - The prime minister has previously attacked websites which show the material, saying: ‘These images normalise sexual violence against women – and they are quite simply poisonous to the young people who see them.’

So you're saying things that aren't appropriate for children are all child abuse?

So 18 rated films are child abuse?

All porn is child abuse? Best ban it.

So you're saying that it's ok for young children to watch 18 rated films?

I'm finding it difficult to discern whether you're being obtuse or you're actually this stupid.

You wanted the conversation and then get shirky because I've said that they should ban child abuse. Your link said about child abuse and I'm firmly against child abuse.

You have yet to say whether you like child abuse or not? Your call

[HeliX]

I got shirky because you brought up child abuse when it had nothing to do with the law in the link. And then presumably when you realised your mistake you tried to turn it into a semantic argument about whether there was a link to a news story about child abuse on the same page. Your words where you were clearly mistaken in thinking this has anything to do with child abuse:

"if you aren't into child abuse, then you'll have no problems with this part then?"

The child abuse story is completely independent of this, like I've already said.

 

And no, I don't think children should watch 18 rated films. I also don't think we should ban everything that children shouldn't do.

[manxy]

I got shirky because you brought up child abuse when it had nothing to do with the law in the link. And then presumably when you realised your mistake you tried to turn it into a semantic argument about whether there was a link to a news story about child abuse on the same page. Your words where you were clearly mistaken in thinking this has anything to do with child abuse:

"if you aren't into child abuse, then you'll have no problems with this part then?"

The child abuse story is completely independent of this, like I've already said.

 

And no, I don't think children should watch 18 rated films. I also don't think we should ban everything that children shouldn't do.

Thank you

I have seen many headlines concerning child abuse and the link you gave said the same. My angle is clearly on protecting children particularly from paedophiles and if there's a lack of images available to those who look at child porn, then I'm pleased their sick fascination is being curtailed.

That was my only focused angle I was following, so say sorry

 

ps; My computers gone really slow since writing on this particular thread? GCHQ already?

[ans]