HeliX Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/20/us-france-trains-idUSKBN0E021720140520 Bit silly eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxman1980 Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 1. Possibly got it wrong after advice from 'consultants.' Happens everywhere - as we know. 2. Someone admitted responsibility. Well, that wouldn't happen here. 3. "When you separate the rail operator (RFF) from the user, SNCF, it doesn't work." But it must do - because Thatcher said it would when they did the same in UK! 1. No they didn't. The Rail Operator (RFF) sent poor information to SNCF. 2. You might have a point, 3. When you have poor communication between two parties you always get problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarne Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 Admitted responsibility, actually got the new trains, and already has a plan to rectify it. As opposed to here: "We're in talks with the manufacturer" "External body to investigate" Etc etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hillshepherd Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 Admitted responsibility, actually got the new trains, and already has a plan to rectify it. As opposed to here: "We're in talks with the manufacturer" "External body to investigate" Etc etc yeh they're fixing it ok,$100 000 000 and counting, socialism stinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Tatlock Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 French communication has always been pretty poor. A while ago they read the signal 'Stand and fight!' as 'Run like shite!' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted May 24, 2014 Share Posted May 24, 2014 Errm... that's actually €50m in total - for a mistake in a system that works brilliantly compared to the British privatised shite. “When it was one industry – British Rail – it was subsidised to the tune of a billion to a billion-and-a-half in today’s money and at the moment it’s getting four billion pounds of taxpayers’ money” Yes but not quite comparing apples with apples. Passenger usage has increased threefold since privatisation and infrastructure investment is on a level never seen in BR times with new lines opening and shortsighted cutbacks, singling and even BR route closures being reversed. I am not in favour of the current model though. Far too complex and a lawyers dream. Vertically integrated track and train companies would have been far better. BR's worst achilles heel? The good old unions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebees Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 Quick give that man a job. We like people like him round here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sick Moon Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 Quick give that man a job. We like people like him round here. I think he was the consultant on the White City Kerbs Project. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.