Jump to content

RJ Reynolds told to pay wife of cancer victim $23.6bn


malebrain

Recommended Posts

I was thinking about suing Snap on tools, as no one warned me that it would hurt if I hit myself round the head with their hammer.

 

Why would you do that? It's akin to saying the award was made for lost eyesight as a result of sticking lit cigarettes into the eyes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

King James I of England (VI of Scotland) wrote that smoking cigarette was bad for you back in the early 17th century. That it is bad for you is not some sudden revelation. I'm against these companies because of the things they add to the cigarettes, but the pay-out here is ridiculously excessive and I'm sure this will go through various appeals until a reduced amount is agreed to, or else perhaps it could even end up at the Supreme Court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I was thinking about suing Snap on tools, as no one warned me that it would hurt if I hit myself round the head with their hammer.

 

Why would you do that? It's akin to saying the award was made for lost eyesight as a result of sticking lit cigarettes into the eyes.

 

Or that the award was made because someone was stupid enough not to realise that smoking was probably going to cause them harm!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...