woolley Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 The same would apply to a Christian group, however, they are recruiting largely from a population where religion is on the wane and therefore cannot pick up the same support. That is certainly the situation at present but things can change. In the face of threat from extremist Islam, it is quite possible that there could be a resurgence of Christianity in Europe in the future and it too could be extreme as something to unite behind. This is why it is so dangerous that we have imported and continue to nurture this malignant force. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sausages Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 That is certainly the situation at present but things can change. In the face of threat from extremist Islam, it is quite possible that there could be a resurgence of Christianity in Europe in the future and it too could be extreme as something to unite behind. This is why it is so dangerous that we have imported and continue to nurture this malignant force. If it means stopping Christianity taking over again then let's nuke the Middle East pronto! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 I think some so-called liberal people seriously believe that they would prefer to live under Islamic rule than American rule were it to be a choice between the two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lxxx Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 I think some so-called liberal people seriously believe that they would prefer to live under Islamic rule than American rule were it to be a choice between the two. Until they banned drinking latté's. Then they'd really revolt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 I think some so-called liberal people seriously believe that they would prefer to live under Islamic rule than American rule were it to be a choice between the two. In the end, will they have a choice...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 The same would apply to a Christian group, however, they are recruiting largely from a population where religion is on the wane and therefore cannot pick up the same support. That is certainly the situation at present but things can change. In the face of threat from extremist Islam, it is quite possible that there could be a resurgence of Christianity in Europe in the future and it too could be extreme as something to unite behind. This is why it is so dangerous that we have imported and continue to nurture this malignant force. And when the children are caught up in the hatred it's easy to see why this problem will continue for generations to come. Poor impressionable souls brain-washed as soon as they're old enough to hate.... https://news.vice.com/video/the-islamic-state-part-2 Parts 1 through 5 are just as pertinent when taken as a whole. We currently have 3 threads, all related to IS, the goings-on in Gaza and institutionalised anti-semitism. There is one common denominator in all the threads- ISLAM! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Jefferson Posted August 21, 2014 Author Share Posted August 21, 2014 We currently have 3 threads, all related to IS, the goings-on in Gaza and institutionalised anti-semitism. There is one common denominator in all the threads- ISLAM! Did you read the Daily Mail article saying "one in four foreigners who have signed up for Islamic State is British - and how half of them are ALREADY back in the UK" ??? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2730602/The-homegrown-jihadists-fighting-ISIS-How-one-four-foreigners-signed-Islamic-State-British-half-ALREADY-UK.html That's a heck of a lot of people being radicalised in Britain. Those who have actually gone to the lengths of going over there must surely be a mere tip in the iceberg. For decades, the Saudis and other crackpot monarchies from the Gulf region have funded the construction of mosques in countries all over the world, all on the condition that they teach Wahhabism and have Wahhabi preachers. They have created a fifth column in every country. All these terrorists are Wahhabists. The radical beliefs of Wahhabism enables its followers to label non-Wahhabi and mainstream Muslims as apostates along with non-Muslims, thus paving the way for their bloodshed. In July 2013, European Parliament identified the Wahhabi movement as the source of global terrorism and a threat to traditional and diverse Muslim cultures of the whole world.[13] Many buildings associated with early Islam, including mazaars, mausoleums, and other artifacts, have been destroyed in Saudi Arabia by Wahhabis from the early 19th century through the present day. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wahhabi_movement I think the UK Parliament should pass law to regulate the funding of mosques or other places of worship. What is the British Muslim Council doing about it? I've got nothing against Muslims or mosques, but something has to be done to cut the Wahhabis out of it. You'd think with so many Muslims being business owners or well-paid doctors, they'd be able to pool their resources to fund mosques in Britain on their own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 It isn't just the impressionable and poorly educated who are susceptible. Many jihadis are extremely well educated. I would accept money from Saudi Arabia to build mosques when they start building churches in their own country and allow open Christian worship there. Our leaders are unbelievably, criminally stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxman1980 Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 TJ, I would not trust the Daily Mail as an accurate source on this subject, however, the BBC have just reported that a lot of radicalisation is being conducted via the internet rather than through Mosques. That then raises the question of restricting the internet which is another subject entirely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Jefferson Posted August 21, 2014 Author Share Posted August 21, 2014 TJ, I would not trust the Daily Mail as an accurate source on this subject, however, the BBC have just reported that a lot of radicalisation is being conducted via the internet rather than through Mosques. That then raises the question of restricting the internet which is another subject entirely. "...I would not trust the Daily Mail, however the BBC..." LOL The BBC is a government media sockpuppet so of course they're going to blame the internet; the government has been wanting to censor the internet and suppress dissent since day one. Just like they did with the printing press before it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxman1980 Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 Sorry TJ, I forgot that the Daily Mail was a bastion of the free press and independent reporting without any agenda at all.... *sigh* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Jefferson Posted August 21, 2014 Author Share Posted August 21, 2014 Sorry TJ, I forgot that the Daily Mail was a bastion of the free press and independent reporting without any agenda at all.... *sigh* The Daily Mail is a pile of garbage. But a lot better than the BBC. I mean, at least the Daily Mail is open and transparent about being biased. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 The Daily Mail is a pile of garbage. But a lot better than the BBC. I mean, at least the Daily Mail is open and transparent about being biased. Absolutely. The BBC is convinced that it is the world bastion of truth. What a joke. It's like the Soviet "hour of well being" when it comes to "community cohesion". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.K. Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 You probably don't like it but the BBC remains the most trusted broadcaster on the planet. Still, why let the facts get in the way of your paranoia... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 You probably don't like it but the BBC remains the most trusted broadcaster on the planet. Still, why let the facts get in the way of your paranoia... Facts? LOL. It's just been taken over by a load of trendy liberals straight from uni and peace marches. You are surely not pretending it is objective? When you watch it you can feel the manipulation like a massage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.