mojomonkey Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 47 minutes ago, paul's got wright said: dont need to i have already written sincerely on the matter of false accusations of that nature. also im not your personal teacher am i so go an do your own research mojo, im not here to convince you of anything x Piss poor troll, thank you and goodnight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 1 hour ago, dilligaf said: But they are all laughing at you. Does that not bother you ? whos laughin at me? is that part of the scientific method? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 Just now, paul's got wright said: 1 hour ago, dilligaf said: But they are all laughing at you. Does that not bother you ? whos laughin at me? is that part of the scientific method? I guess that we are all laughing at you to be honest. You are also part of the experiment too. Be careful out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 38 minutes ago, mojomonkey said: Piss poor troll, thank you and goodnight. so if someone tells you to look into something for yourself, in your eyes they are a troll? very strange in my opinion. you cant handle what you might find probably dont want your beliefs challenged. are there any mods looking at this thread? please may i be equally protected from false accusations now tantamount to bullying, given the ignorance of the attacks and the fact that i have stated my reasons for posting in this subject and this forum, repeatedly. i like discussing the subject but i am not obliged to provide anything other than my views here. thanks in advance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 3 minutes ago, dilligaf said: I guess that we are all laughing at you to be honest. You are also part of the experiment too. Be careful out there. why are you laughing at me mate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 5 minutes ago, paul's got wright said: why are you laughing at me mate? ER, let me think now. The film Anchor man has just popped into my head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 like i said, ridicule, attempted or otherwise, isn't part of the scientific method. nor is it scientific to jump to conclusions, or berate those immersed in research on a subject you may have biased beliefs about x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bastard Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 5 minutes ago, paul's got wright said: i'm aware of them. nor did you devise the system of measurement or come to your own conclusions that you live on a spinning sphere. you were taught it from a child, given no opportunity to come to your own thoughts about the world. like the rest of us. so i know why you believe it and thats fine by me. dont try an push ye beliefs on me though. That's a classic ad hominem attack, attempting to undermine China's arguments purely by attacking his background. China has given you a set of measurements that you can easily verify - you can go out there and measure them yourself, and he's interested to hear what your explanation is for the difference in shadow lengths that's readily apparent. The measurements don't vary according to your level of indoctrination, or by your personal set of beliefs, they're replicable by anyone - you yourself can go out and measure them. Rather than attacking Chinahand's background to try to undermine a straight-forward observation, what's your explanation for the difference in shadow lengths ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 3 minutes ago, The Bastard said: That's a classic ad hominem attack, attempting to undermine China's arguments purely by attacking his background. China has given you a set of measurements that you can easily verify - you can go out there and measure them yourself, and he's interested to hear what your explanation is for the difference in shadow lengths that's readily apparent. The measurements don't vary according to your level of indoctrination, or by your personal set of beliefs, they're replicable by anyone - you yourself can go out and measure them. Rather than attacking Chinahand's background to try to undermine a straight-forward observation, what's your explanation for the difference in shadow lengths ? not an attack on china just the facts of our upbringing. told what to think not so much how to think. china is clearly an intelligent person so certainly not an attack from me. i stand by my post. i understand the experiment and what can be garnered from it. that's how i know it doesn't constitute what is known as irrefutable proof. nor do i need, or did i ask for, any advice or help with my research. so it stands that i am not obliged to follow any orders from you china or anybody else on the matter. if that satisfies your criteria for proof and you think measuring shadows and sticks proves you live on a spinning ball then good for you tb. my research continues x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 14 minutes ago, paul's got wright said: like i said, ridicule, attempted or otherwise, isn't part of the scientific method. nor is it scientific to jump to conclusions, or berate those immersed in research on a subject you may have biased beliefs about x Or you could be taking the piss or thick as fuck. Who knows ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 Have you ever shared any of your research? I don't mean links to YouTube, or other peoples works. I mean research that you personally have completed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bastard Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 4 minutes ago, paul's got wright said: . my research continues x What you're doing is not "research", since the definition of research usually includes an element of systematic investigation. If you were truly researching the subject, you would not reject evidence that might suggest that your conclusions are wrong, merely on the grounds that it might suggest that your conclusions are wrong. Instead, you are leading yourself down the very avenue that you accuse China of taking, that of confirmation bias. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 58 minutes ago, dilligaf said: Or you could be taking the piss or thick as fuck. Who knows ? me. it's neither i can assure you x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 58 minutes ago, ans said: Have you ever shared any of your research? I don't mean links to YouTube, or other peoples works. I mean research that you personally have completed? all the time ans x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 56 minutes ago, The Bastard said: What you're doing is not "research", since the definition of research usually includes an element of systematic investigation. If you were truly researching the subject, you would not reject evidence that might suggest that your conclusions are wrong, merely on the grounds that it might suggest that your conclusions are wrong. Instead, you are leading yourself down the very avenue that you accuse China of taking, that of confirmation bias. what conclusions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.