paul's got wright Posted May 4, 2018 Share Posted May 4, 2018 3 minutes ago, Chinahand said: Ok Paul, I am basically happy with this list. Crack on. What do you have to say? ok but basically happy isn't a good start china you need to accept it scientifically, for what it is. must we go to citation or will you just post your objection please to check it's validity? i'll say what i have said previously. if it doesn't agree with experiment then it is wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted May 4, 2018 Share Posted May 4, 2018 3 minutes ago, paul's got wright said: 10 minutes ago, Chinahand said: Ok Paul, I am basically happy with this list. Crack on. What do you have to say? ok but basically happy isn't a good start china you need to accept it scientifically, for what it is. must we go to citation or will you just post your objection please to check it's validity? i'll say what i have said previously. if it doesn't agree with experiment then it is wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted May 4, 2018 Share Posted May 4, 2018 On 5/3/2018 at 8:11 PM, Neil Down said: I note with interest that so far you haven’t followed up on your bullshit claim... "all you've gotta do is bounce it, to see just what goes where. there aint no way around it, so i have come well prepared. don't ye know?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted May 4, 2018 Share Posted May 4, 2018 Just now, dilligaf said: ahh the stereotypical religious troll, evading science in the most bizzarre way x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted May 4, 2018 Share Posted May 4, 2018 5 minutes ago, paul's got wright said: ahh the stereotypical religious troll, evading science in the most bizzarre way x and you zed that I could not spell ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinahand Posted May 4, 2018 Share Posted May 4, 2018 Paul this is childish. If you have anything to say say it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted May 4, 2018 Share Posted May 4, 2018 3 minutes ago, Chinahand said: Paul this is childish. If you have anything to say say it. I think Paul has just caught the biggest fish in the lake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Down Posted May 4, 2018 Share Posted May 4, 2018 36 minutes ago, Chinahand said: Paul this is childish. If you have anything to say say it. I thought you would have sussed by now that he hasn't... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinahand Posted May 4, 2018 Share Posted May 4, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted May 4, 2018 Share Posted May 4, 2018 1 hour ago, dilligaf said: and you zed that I could not spell ? Of course you can! Cast away Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted May 4, 2018 Share Posted May 4, 2018 55 minutes ago, Chinahand said: Paul this is childish. If you have anything to say say it. Either accept it as scientifically accurate or make your objection? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted May 4, 2018 Share Posted May 4, 2018 19 minutes ago, Neil Down said: I thought you would have sussed by now that he hasn't... Au contraire nelly i have proposed to test the validity of chinas evidence, scientifically. How did you miss that? Didnt you keep the glasses when you ditched the granny gangstar avatar? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted May 4, 2018 Share Posted May 4, 2018 China do you accept the accuracy or not. Then we can proceed. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinahand Posted May 4, 2018 Share Posted May 4, 2018 Paul this is silly. Science is not a rigid list of procedures to be rigidly followed. What you have posted is a perfectly acceptable lie-to-children so crack on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted May 4, 2018 Share Posted May 4, 2018 I agree china, its silly of you to refuse to either accept or object to the validity of the steps i gave you. I offered you the oppurtunity to provide them. You never. I told you to use citation so we could agree and proceed. But you didn't. So i will now assert that it is a valid process in the correct order, and no valid objections have been made to it here, by you or anyone else. Therefore this is how i will scrutinise the evidence you and others have offered, by way of citation from univeritys and scholars. It only took you 3 years to cotton on! So now you know that when we plug the evidence in, the scientific method will tell us of its validity. And if it disagrees with experiment then its wrong. And if you havent got an experiment then its not science. And if you just want to explain things away will nilly then its philosophy. Welcome to reality china, i hope you enjoy your stay x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.