paul's got wright Posted October 11, 2018 Share Posted October 11, 2018 44 minutes ago, dilligaf said: What are all these "religious" jibes about.? I am not religious and I can't think of any more than about 4 posters who may be. You seem to think we must all be religious because we "believe" the earth is not flat and all the space travel is real. Your attendance for a start! How do you think life started on earth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Down Posted October 11, 2018 Share Posted October 11, 2018 1 minute ago, paul's got wright said: Your attendance for a start! How do you think life started on earth? Stick to the topic you are not answering Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted October 11, 2018 Share Posted October 11, 2018 46 minutes ago, Neil Down said: Forgive him my son, for he knows not what he says... You found him! Its wearing off! More crosswords less cross words nelly! You adorable old wally x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbie Bobster Posted October 11, 2018 Share Posted October 11, 2018 4 hours ago, Bobbie Bobster said: The simple answer is because Apollo met its geopolitical goal of demonstrating superiority over the USSR. Once this was done, the (political) need for a moon program was over. However, this was at a significant financal cost, and also human cost, not least in the deaths of the crew of Apollo 1, other US astronauts that died in T38 flights (at least 3 in the 1960s) and a number of Russian cosmonauts. The death toll could have been much higher as the margin for success with Apollo was extremely thin - as evidenced by the fact that it would probably take a crash program 10 years (with lorryloads of cash) from now to get boots on the moon again. For more background on this, may I suggest Decision to Go to the Moon: Apollo Project and the National Interest by Dr. John M. Logsdon which is the reference publication for this topic. 3 hours ago, paul's got wright said: More to it than that bob x There is more in the book I've suggested to you above, but my synopsis above is accurate, although simplified. If you're interested, there's quite a body of information out there about the post-Apollo plans (The Apollo Applications Program), including one mission proposal for a manned Venus flyby. What would be worse, I hear you ask. Living in an Apollo Command Module for 13 months, pooping into bags stuck to your arse cheeks (not constantly, of course) for the chance of seeing Venus close up for one orbit. Or re-reading all 295 pages of this guff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted October 11, 2018 Share Posted October 11, 2018 49 minutes ago, paul's got wright said: Your attendance for a start! How do you think life started on earth? With you and a female amoeba, probably. Yeah I know they aren't sexed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted October 11, 2018 Share Posted October 11, 2018 1 hour ago, Neil Down said: Stick to the topic you are not answering I dont take orders from wallies nelly, you know that fine well x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted October 11, 2018 Share Posted October 11, 2018 41 minutes ago, Bobbie Bobster said: There is more in the book I've suggested to you above, but my synopsis above is accurate, although simplified. If you're interested, there's quite a body of information out there about the post-Apollo plans (The Apollo Applications Program), including one mission proposal for a manned Venus flyby. What would be worse, I hear you ask. Living in an Apollo Command Module for 13 months, pooping into bags stuck to your arse cheeks (not constantly, of course) for the chance of seeing Venus close up for one orbit. Or re-reading all 295 pages of this guff. Close but no cigar bob! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinahand Posted October 11, 2018 Share Posted October 11, 2018 Paul, are you going to explain your point about NASA or just mess around? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted October 11, 2018 Share Posted October 11, 2018 28 minutes ago, dilligaf said: With you and a female amoeba, probably. Yeah I know they aren't sexed Neil lets just bring you back down to earth for a second. You believe theories that men wrote in books, that you yourself did not come up with, nor do you comprehend. Thats your world view. Sounds really similar to people who belive stories written in books to get their world view, doesn't it! And chinahand simply cannot demonstrate the spinning globe on a working model. Coz he hasnt got one for his world view Your attendance here is simply religious x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Down Posted October 11, 2018 Share Posted October 11, 2018 1 minute ago, paul's got wright said: Neil lets just bring you back down to earth for a second. You believe theories that men wrote in books, that you yourself did not come up with, nor do you comprehend. Thats your world view. Sounds really similar to people who belive stories written in books to get their world view, doesn't it! And chinahand simply cannot demonstrate the spinning globe on a working model. Coz he hasnt got one for his world view Your attendance here is simply religious x High on pot again are you. You’re replying to dill you loon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted October 11, 2018 Share Posted October 11, 2018 4 minutes ago, Chinahand said: Paul, are you going to explain your point about NASA or just mess around? Yes im not messin around china, although i do have fun doing my sciencing in here with you, the least rude, most researched member of the crew x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbie Bobster Posted October 11, 2018 Share Posted October 11, 2018 13 minutes ago, paul's got wright said: Close but no cigar bob Afraid not, old bean. Academic consensus on the research of the most respected scholar of human spaceflight or some loon on the net. No contest, really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted October 11, 2018 Share Posted October 11, 2018 1 minute ago, Neil Down said: High on pot again are you. You’re replying to dill you loon You been sniffin off chinas prozzies again on tick? Remember nelly, we are only as good as our machine behaves. The handheld i use skips the page up and down clearly i was responding to you by using your name! Unlike you addressing common strangers as loyal family members! Comment stands and also goes for dilly double! Two religious trols x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Colombe Posted October 11, 2018 Share Posted October 11, 2018 You are all biffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted October 11, 2018 Share Posted October 11, 2018 Just now, Bobbie Bobster said: Afraid not, old bean. Academic consensus on the research of the most respected scholar of human spaceflight or some loon on the net. No contest, really. You dont know or you would have mentioned the main reason, as i shall prove by providing the nasa explanation on video No cigar not even a dimp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.