dilligaf Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 Paul. Do you not think it is time to just pull the plug on this ? I'm getting dizzy going round and round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 No ones forcing you to science dilly! You must just have a soft spot for it x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 2 minutes ago, paul's got wright said: No ones forcing you to science dilly! You must just have a soft spot for it x But it was interesting for the first 30 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 Here's to the next 30! Cheers dilly x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Colombe Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 22 minutes ago, dilligaf said: Wrong. It is a grammar problem, not an English one. You're welcome. Ah yes, the two traditional core subjects of our education system. Maths and err, Grammar. You dick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxman1980 Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 9 hours ago, paul's got wright said: Who knows? Lets find out eminem. What is the scientific evidence you can provide, that the earth we live on is a spinning oblate spheroid, hurling through the vacum of space, with unimaginable vast bodies of tidal waters, all in perfect sync and motion, and travelling around the sun? Cant wait x You cited the definition of the scientific method from the University of Rochester and they have on their own website numerous references to the globe and even images depicting the globe. Are you suggesting that this institute which you hold in such esteem would have something such as the shape of our world wrong on their website? I also notice that you are avoiding Chinahand again... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinahand Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 He’s said he can’t do the maths. Paul you should look up trig functions. Think how you could use tan to solve the triangles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uhtred Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 2 minutes ago, Chinahand said: He’s said he can’t do the maths. Paul you should look up trig functions. Think how you could use tan to solve the triangles. Paul thinks Trig is a character from Only Fools and Horses and Tan is what you get on a Spanish beach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojomonkey Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 8 hours ago, manxman1980 said: You cited the definition of the scientific method from the University of Rochester and they have on their own website numerous references to the globe and even images depicting the globe. Are you suggesting that this institute which you hold in such esteem would have something such as the shape of our world wrong on their website? I also notice that you are avoiding Chinahand again... Would you like another citation from another uni? I posterd stanford, would you like Harvard and yale? I hold none of them in any esteem! You do though, as does china. Good luck debunking it. Good luck providing the evidence i asked for as well. Any scientist can be wrong, that is why science welcomes scrutiny. Maths will not save chinahand here eminem. This is the science thread mate x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 19 hours ago, Chinahand said: Sigh - well Paul, are you going to try and solve a 14 year olds old's maths problem rather than insisting I'm ignoring the Rochester University while I patiently build an argument based around the Rochester University web page? Here's the diagram - your objective is to get an expression for y depending upon x and h. I'm guessing you'll not be up to it and will accuse me of being religious, but why don't you give it a try. Not at all china nothing religious about this diagram. Its just irrelevant to the point of this thread. We are looking for scientifically validated evidence that the earth is a spinning oblate spheroid. Maths doesnt cut it. I just challenged you to show me where it is in the scientific method? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 9 hours ago, Chinahand said: He’s said he can’t do the maths. Paul you should look up trig functions. Think how you could use tan to solve the triangles. I never said i cant do it china thats not fair. I can do anything i like if i study it well enough. There must be something you have yet to learn in maths? We all have our stage we are currently at, anyone can improve and learn more. It would take my free time off though china! Trig is easy china come on mate! Anyone could do the basics! Imagine me takin you for a game of 5 a side! The difference is i can learn maths to any level i like within my ability, and i am well capable china i can assure you. Look into the science, of speed of thought in football. Its fascinating. The most intelligent players think the fastest with the highest results of completion. If you are a novice footballer, with weak technique, slow decision making, then there is no amount of study or practice will ever get you to a decent level. You simply couldn't cope with the advanced players. You could practice for 10 yrs, and still get nowhwere near. If you have no natural ability it really hinders progress to the highest level in some ways. I know maths can be extraordinarily complex at the highest level and i commend your awsome ability to understand theories and concepts at such levels. But maths cant save you here china, only science can x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uhtred Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 1 hour ago, paul's got wright said: Would you like another citation from another uni? I posterd stanford, would you like Harvard and yale? I hold none of them in any esteem! That’s a shame because Harvard think you’re great...just like those teachers do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Does that prove the ball is spinning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 If you had the opportunity to be strapped-in to a high-altitude weather-balloon and whisked-up to 105,000 feet, would you believe your own eyes? Would that be the only proof you'd accept? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.