paul's got wright Posted December 8, 2018 Share Posted December 8, 2018 He has given his email for anyone who repeats the test, to contact him.he encourages people to repeat the test as much as they can or need to, before contacting him. He found the metabunk calculator to be incorrect and no longer agrees with the surveying model, he once accepted to be correct, as is explained in his video. You see china, if you watch HIS video, he tells you why he has done this test, and how the results changed his world view. He has a PhD in spectrophotometry, and he has gone out and done the test. Thr results are in, and they disagree with the model x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxy Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 On 12/8/2018 at 5:07 PM, paul's got wright said: He has given his email for anyone who repeats the test, to contact him.he encourages people to repeat the test as much as they can or need to, before contacting him. He found the metabunk calculator to be incorrect and no longer agrees with the surveying model, he once accepted to be correct, as is explained in his video. You see china, if you watch HIS video, he tells you why he has done this test, and how the results changed his world view. He has a PhD in spectrophotometry, and he has gone out and done the test. Thr results are in, and they disagree with the model x I watched the video and although lengthy, he provided information on both model earths and provides 6 undisputed accepted science @1:35:27 In his Summary and final conclusions, he states that We do not live on the World Geodetic System, WGS 84 Globe / Ellipsoid model. So now we know. That said, I cannot see it making a difference as people tend to react when things affect them personally and as long as they get their pay, somewhere to live and have food to eat, then the earth might as well be square shaped for all it mattered? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 3 minutes ago, manxy said: I watched the video and although lengthy, he provided information on both model earths and provides 6 undisputed accepted science @1:35:27 In his Summary and final conclusions, he states that We do not live on the World Geodetic System, WGS 84 Globe / Ellipsoid model. So now we know. That said, I cannot see it making a difference as people tend to react when things affect them personally and as long as they get their pay, somewhere to live and have food to eat, then the earth might as well be square shaped for all it mattered? You are so lucky that Roy Costain is not a force to be reckoned with. You are 100% mental. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxy Posted December 11, 2018 Share Posted December 11, 2018 13 hours ago, dilligaf said: You are so lucky that Roy Costain is not a force to be reckoned with. You are 100% mental. I unblocked you this time round to see what drivel you wrote and my conclusion of what you write has not changed in the slightest and a shame that the moderators permit you to leave so many negative comments on a once happy forum FACTS ARE - We do not live on the World Geodetic System, WGS 84 Globe / Ellipsoid model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted December 11, 2018 Share Posted December 11, 2018 5 minutes ago, manxy said: FACTS ARE - We do not live on the World Geodetic System, WGS 84 Globe / Ellipsoid model. In your view you mean, because the "facts" disagree with your view. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxy Posted December 11, 2018 Share Posted December 11, 2018 3 hours ago, RIchard Britten said: In your view you mean, because the "facts" disagree with your view. My view is based on logic, truth and accuracy of his conclusion as seen in the video. If you have not viewed the full video, then you are negligent with your viewpoint as he clearly tries to demonstrate both sides of the globe or flat earth models. 2+2 do not make 5 and he has taken logical steps in producing a conclusion. I look forward to ANY FACT that you wish to counter argue with this based on what he has factually tested and would like to know as to what or who's information you may be using and links to it? For me, I cannot avoid the FACTS SHOWN in his video and unless science comes up with a new scientific discovery, then the facts are simple - We do not live on the World Geodetic System, WGS 84 Globe / Ellipsoid model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted December 11, 2018 Share Posted December 11, 2018 7 minutes ago, manxy said: My view is based on logic, truth and accuracy of his conclusion as seen in the video. If you have not viewed the full video, then you are negligent with your viewpoint as he clearly tries to demonstrate both sides of the globe or flat earth models. 2+2 do not make 5 and he has taken logical steps in producing a conclusion. I look forward to ANY FACT that you wish to counter argue with this based on what he has factually tested and would like to know as to what or who's information you may be using and links to it? For me, I cannot avoid the FACTS SHOWN in his video and unless science comes up with a new scientific discovery, then the facts are simple - We do not live on the World Geodetic System, WGS 84 Globe / Ellipsoid model. Did he explain in the video why he chose a distance of 15.4 km? I'll give you a clue, it is within the proven (and heavily documented) horizonal distance of 19km (at sea level). We do you think FE types have never managed to show a laser two points over 50, 100, 150 miles away, which should be possible in a FE Model? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Down Posted December 11, 2018 Share Posted December 11, 2018 Sigh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted December 11, 2018 Share Posted December 11, 2018 2 hours ago, RIchard Britten said: Did he explain in the video why he chose a distance of 15.4 km? I'll give you a clue, it is within the proven (and heavily documented) horizonal distance of 19km (at sea level). We do you think FE types have never managed to show a laser two points over 50, 100, 150 miles away, which should be possible in a FE Model? Because the laser beam would diverge over greater distances. The test was with the telescope/camera as well. Did you even bother to watch the video? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted December 11, 2018 Share Posted December 11, 2018 So a PhD Spectrphotometrist, has been out and done the tests after hearing about flat eafth laser tests being conducted. He answers all the expected questions at the start of the video, gives a detailed explanation of his credentials, reasoning and proposed tests. Comes back with the results, all on video, and gets called a "flat earther" just for showing that they do not match the surveying model! Typical cult behavior, from the abbreviation of richard x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbie Bobster Posted December 11, 2018 Share Posted December 11, 2018 12 minutes ago, paul's got wright said: So a PhD Spectrphotometrist, has been out and done the tests after hearing about flat eafth laser tests being conducted. OMG, it's the Smocking Gun! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted December 11, 2018 Share Posted December 11, 2018 14 minutes ago, Bobbie Bobster said: OMG, it's the Smocking Gun! Its just belief checking blob. He found information, via testing, which oppOsed his world view, so now he has changed his world view x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbie Bobster Posted December 11, 2018 Share Posted December 11, 2018 6 minutes ago, paul's got wright said: which oppsed his world view Smocking is catching Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted December 11, 2018 Share Posted December 11, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbie Bobster Posted December 11, 2018 Share Posted December 11, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.