TheTeapot Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 10 hours ago, Uhtred said: Inversely proportional. Nah, those long FE videos are FULL of science. Pure science. All the facts. Spirit levels on aeroplanes and everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 13 hours ago, wrighty said: @paul's got wright - why are all the videos you post so long? I was going to have a look at that one from the PhD guy, but it’s 1:40 long so have better things to do. Same as many of the others. Do you know of any, say 10 minutes in length, that support the FE view or debunk the ‘spinning oblate spheroid’ model? Most scientific concepts I know of can be explained and evidenced in that sort of time. Why not FE? California waiting is only 3 an half minutes! The PhD fella changed his world view by testing the surveying model. Not by watching a 10 min video! just look for top flat earth proofs on yt. Loads of short videos there. See what you think of them x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sausages Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 How do you know he has a PhD? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 13 hours ago, manxy said: I also cannot change the mind of a person/s who are unwilling to accept what has been stated as factual. Are you describing yourself here? What has been stated as "factual?" There are no "facts" involved in FET no matter how elaborate, slick and professional those contrived videos appear. I asked in a previous post, "who benefits" in keeping this 'truth' from everyone else in the world. Why has, for millenia, some secretive organisation conspired against humanity to push a global earth when it is apparently flat, as you propound. You declined to answer for some reason. I asked PGW the same question and he couldn't/wouldn't provide an answer either. The same question I've seen asked online to other flat-earthers too and a straight answer came there none. Is it because you're all unable to credibly back up your claims of a flat earth, beyond a certain level? Relying instead on an abundant supply of blinkered, crank videos from virtual nobodies on the internet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 15 hours ago, Neil Down said: They are deliberately long so as to wear you down with the insanity of it. A short clip would disprove all they believe in... A short clip? Please provide said clip nelly, lets see if you can disprove all they believe in! Cant wait for this, the silver bullet x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 5 hours ago, RIchard Britten said: He carried out a test with limited scope and got limited results. That is the point I am trying to make. He provided his email and credentials, he also provided the test details, and invites anyone to repeat the test, if they wish to dispute it in any way. His results stand, until somebody can repeat them and come up with different results. Then he will talk science with you. As it stands, you are just a cry in the wind by comparison. All mouth no action x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Down Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 Don't get sucked into the stupidity Richard... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 3 hours ago, Mr. Sausages said: How do you know he has a PhD? Whether he is or not, it is how he presents his claim, so he is to be presented correctly. Thats fair. Why dont you email him see if he will provide proof for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 17 minutes ago, Neil Down said: Don't get sucked into the stupidity Richard... Yeah richard, dont troll the science thread, its unhealthy and immoral x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sausages Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 I did, he said it was all a wind up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 5 minutes ago, Mr. Sausages said: I did, he said it was all a wind up. #sausagenews Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 Dont worry sausages, im sure one of our genius forum members will repeat the test soon, and prove him wrong. Right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 Join the panel and become a ball earth hero. Like eratosthenes! End the debate, or even, email a spectrophotometrist with your results x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rushen Spy Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 Steph Curry thinks the moon landing was a big hoax ... and now NASA wants to turn the NBA superstar into a believer ... giving him a personal invite to tour all the evidence that proves it all happened. http://amp.tmz.com/2018/12/11/stephen-curry-offer-visit-nasa-space-center/?fbclid=IwAR2y_mb7zDds6hMVgVuzfzC3I6Ahn-1DRYz6ekBiBOo2xa6YhCiRE31CUE4 Paul, would you say, if the moon landing can be demonstrated to have happened, that this casts doubt on a flat earth model, as presumably they would have needed to pass the Van Allen radiation belt (or any "firmament" put there by a deity) to make it to the moon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.