paul's got wright Posted July 9, 2019 Share Posted July 9, 2019 The joke being your religious behaviour blobzy, there's the rub ken x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted July 9, 2019 Share Posted July 9, 2019 You see quilp, its the lack of scientific evidence for the spinning ball, that leads to this type of activism x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted July 9, 2019 Share Posted July 9, 2019 2 minutes ago, paul's got wright said: You see quilp, its the lack of scientific evidence for the spinning ball, that leads to this type of activism x , and er…... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted July 9, 2019 Share Posted July 9, 2019 Obviously dilly is as blind as quilp, and others,regarding the whole fe topic. Neither of you really grasp its simplicity. Not surprisingly, nor do many others. Thats part of the "joke", but only a small part. The fact that the walter brigade fail to, dare i say, recognize the gravity of the situation, is absolutley the most amusing part of this topic in general, but especially in this thread. The more blind faith they display, the worse it gets for them. All bravado no scientific evidence. I suppose after 4 yrs i should offer the walters in the alters a bit of a clue. Quilp, blobzy and dilly, walters in chief. Imagine if you had to defend the ball in court(bit like tennis) and were to present your evidence to a judge, jury and public gallery. What scientific evidence could you present? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted July 9, 2019 Share Posted July 9, 2019 4 minutes ago, paul's got wright said: Obviously dilly is as blind as quilp, and others,regarding the whole fe topic. Neither of you really grasp its simplicity. Not surprisingly, nor do many others. Thats part of the "joke", but only a small part. The fact that the walter brigade fail to, dare i say, recognize the gravity of the situation, is absolutley the most amusing part of this topic in general, but especially in this thread. The more blind faith they display, the worse it gets for them. All bravado no scientific evidence. I suppose after 4 yrs i should offer the walters in the alters a bit of a clue. Quilp, blobzy and dilly, walters in chief. Imagine if you had to defend the ball in court(bit like tennis) and were to present your evidence to a judge, jury and public gallery. What scientific evidence could you present? A starting point may be simply night and day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted July 9, 2019 Share Posted July 9, 2019 Indeed, although a facile notion. How would you develope it for the court? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted July 9, 2019 Share Posted July 9, 2019 6 minutes ago, paul's got wright said: Indeed, although a facile notion. How would you develope it for the court? Black and white. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted July 9, 2019 Share Posted July 9, 2019 You're the defendant in court remember, not the jester! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinahand Posted July 10, 2019 Share Posted July 10, 2019 8 hours ago, dilligaf said: A starting point may be simply night and day. Dilli's right. Evidence for a spherical earth. Just because you don't understand why it is evidence, doesn't mean it isn't. Sundials would be just as good evidence - the change in the the gnomon angle as you change latitude is perfectly good evidence that the earth is a globe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted July 10, 2019 Share Posted July 10, 2019 Why are you making false claims as part of your evidence china? Doesnt stand up on its own? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted July 10, 2019 Share Posted July 10, 2019 1 minute ago, paul's got wright said: Why are you making false claims as part of your evidence china? Doesnt stand up on its own? If you are not a flat earther and not a "globe hugger", what are you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted July 10, 2019 Share Posted July 10, 2019 10 minutes ago, RIchard Britten said: If you are not a flat earther and not a "globe hugger", what are you? A man who knows his rights, and retains them at all times. What are you dick? Ball hugger or just ball balliever? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted July 10, 2019 Share Posted July 10, 2019 9 minutes ago, paul's got wright said: A man who knows his rights, and retains them at all times. What are you dick? Ball hugger or just ball balliever? While that is an answer, it it not an answer to the question I asked. As to what I am, I understand the science and mathematics in play that prove a oblate spheroid globe, and I can see how the science and mathematics do not support a flat earth (as presented by the FE community). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Down Posted July 10, 2019 Share Posted July 10, 2019 1 hour ago, paul's got wright said: A man who knows how to troll, at all times. I am a dick? Ball hugger or just ball balliever? corrected for accuracy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted July 10, 2019 Share Posted July 10, 2019 7 hours ago, RIchard Britten said: While that is an answer, it it not an answer to the question I asked. As to what I am, I understand the science and mathematics in play that prove a oblate spheroid globe, and I can see how the science and mathematics do not support a flat earth (as presented by the FE community). It is indeed the answer to the question you asked britten! You just dont understand it. You are a ball hugger by definition. Why would there be a flat earth community in 2019? Think about it x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.