The Sick Moon Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 these boys are on the ball. polite as well, which is refreshing x Is it a flat ball? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 they differ in opinions but remain polite. best etiquette on the ball x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gerrydandridge Posted June 20, 2015 Author Share Posted June 20, 2015 Another mysterious coincidence - the first mention of numerology, opening up another rich vein of trollery, was in post 1019 of page 68. 1/1/1968 - Pope Paul's Day of Peace. Gerry, am I doing it right? Very good bobster, those lodge nights have paid off well.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinahand Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 Paul, if people continue to spread falsehood even when it is clear that what they are saying is false how should you respond? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gerrydandridge Posted June 20, 2015 Author Share Posted June 20, 2015 As far as I can see, the following have been discussed and been found to have problems when asked to prove that we are a spinning ball in space. The Coriolis EFFECT. The Foucault pendulum. Polaris and the movement of the stars. Light refraction and mirages when people can see a city skyline from 60 miles away, when the top of the highest buildings should be 1000 feet below the horizon. And least impressive is the honesty of NASA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 you are not the arbiter of life and knowledge china. you have no hand x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gerrydandridge Posted June 20, 2015 Author Share Posted June 20, 2015 It really does boggle my mind that people still choose to believe that Armstrong set foot on a moon 240,000 miles away, in 1969, this lie in itself should make people re-evaluate the situation, but no, I just don't understand it, people talk of religiosity well scientism is the new religion I would say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbie Bobster Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 Post 1028 = ((2^8)+1)*2^2. This is incredible! And as my friends know, I prefer Premier Inn to Travelodge. Holiday Inn Express at a pinch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinahand Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 What problems - clearly document them Gerry. "I don't believe/understand it" is a problem for you not the science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbie Bobster Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 you are not the arbiter of life and knowledge china. you have no hand xT'Pau! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gerrydandridge Posted June 20, 2015 Author Share Posted June 20, 2015 To add, no accounting for curvature in building bridges, railways, canals. Navigation with preferred results using plane trigonometry . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 It really does boggle my mind that people still choose to believe that Armstrong set foot on a moon 240,000 miles away, in 1969, this lie in itself should make people re-evaluate the situation, but no, I just don't understand it, people talk of religiosity well scientism is the new religion I would say. It boggles my mind that people believe those who say he didn't. You are now presenting this nonsense as a truth to justify your even wilder fantasies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinahand Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 Gerry you are a straight out liar. There is no other word for it. You making claims about things does not make them true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul's got wright Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 who's the most skillful tennis player on the ball china? who's the most talented footballer on the ball? what does science have to say about that! x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gerrydandridge Posted June 20, 2015 Author Share Posted June 20, 2015 Gerry you are a straight out liar. There is no other word for it. You making claims about things does not make them true. What lies, people cant handle the truth so I am a troll, I give a logical explanation for an effect here, that you claim is proof of a spinning ball model and I am liar.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.