Jump to content

What is the meaning of life?


Swaraj

Recommended Posts

 

 

 

There's been like 5 threads on atheism and morality in the last year. It comes down to mutual respect. If you wouldn't want it to happen to you, don't do it to someone else! Dead simple stuff. Fortunately most people are capable of following this rule of thumb.

As for a meaning to life - why do you need one? Have as much fun as you can without negatively impacting anyone else's ability to have a nice life. Crackin'.

And as the next question is always "Don't you fear death?" - No. I fear not living enough.

 

No, there haven't; there has been approximately ONE thread on that topic. The topic of my thread is about the meaning of life. It was a call for people to think about the meaning of life and how that ties in with the social and economic order in which we live; it was not a call for atheist fundamentalists to come and gatecrash the thread and preach their pseudointellectual crap about there being no meaning to life. Thanks, after what Stalin, Mao Tsi Tung and Pol Pot did, I think we already know that you place little or no meaning or value on human life.

Good grief you're a bellend. :lol:

Is that the best counter argument you can come up with? Profanity and insult? This is the problem with atheists who have turned their backs on the creator, they lose all caring for their fellow man as they attempt to destroy the community spirits created by generations of spiritual leadership inspired by the creator. Mankind can only work together and live peacefully when it has a common grounding and appreciation for the cosmos that created us with a purpose. When that purpose is lost amonst selfish and uncaring attitudes like yours, with no tolerance for your fellow human beings, it results in misery for others, but as an atheist you wouldn't care about that.

And the problem with some people who have absolute belief and trust that God is as real as night following day is that SOME believe that non-believers are incapable or unwilling or unable to follow a perfectly good and moral lifestyle.

 

They are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

 

 

 

 

There's been like 5 threads on atheism and morality in the last year. It comes down to mutual respect. If you wouldn't want it to happen to you, don't do it to someone else! Dead simple stuff. Fortunately most people are capable of following this rule of thumb.

As for a meaning to life - why do you need one? Have as much fun as you can without negatively impacting anyone else's ability to have a nice life. Crackin'.

And as the next question is always "Don't you fear death?" - No. I fear not living enough.

No, there haven't; there has been approximately ONE thread on that topic. The topic of my thread is about the meaning of life. It was a call for people to think about the meaning of life and how that ties in with the social and economic order in which we live; it was not a call for atheist fundamentalists to come and gatecrash the thread and preach their pseudointellectual crap about there being no meaning to life. Thanks, after what Stalin, Mao Tsi Tung and Pol Pot did, I think we already know that you place little or no meaning or value on human life.

Good grief you're a bellend. laugh.png

Is that the best counter argument you can come up with? Profanity and insult? This is the problem with atheists who have turned their backs on the creator, they lose all caring for their fellow man as they attempt to destroy the community spirits created by generations of spiritual leadership inspired by the creator. Mankind can only work together and live peacefully when it has a common grounding and appreciation for the cosmos that created us with a purpose. When that purpose is lost amonst selfish and uncaring attitudes like yours, with no tolerance for your fellow human beings, it results in misery for others, but as an atheist you wouldn't care about that.

And the problem with some people who have absolute belief and trust that God is as real as night following day is that SOME believe that non-believers are incapable or unwilling or unable to follow a perfectly good and moral lifestyle.

 

They are.

 

 

But they only do because our society is so heavily influenced by Judeo-Christian philosophy and morals. And whilst there can be some good atheists because of this, they are simultaneously destroying that moral philosophy so that future generations will be deprived of it, and once that happens there will be nothing to stop the next genocidal leader from wiping out entire races.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

There's been like 5 threads on atheism and morality in the last year. It comes down to mutual respect. If you wouldn't want it to happen to you, don't do it to someone else! Dead simple stuff. Fortunately most people are capable of following this rule of thumb.

As for a meaning to life - why do you need one? Have as much fun as you can without negatively impacting anyone else's ability to have a nice life. Crackin'.

And as the next question is always "Don't you fear death?" - No. I fear not living enough.

No, there haven't; there has been approximately ONE thread on that topic. The topic of my thread is about the meaning of life. It was a call for people to think about the meaning of life and how that ties in with the social and economic order in which we live; it was not a call for atheist fundamentalists to come and gatecrash the thread and preach their pseudointellectual crap about there being no meaning to life. Thanks, after what Stalin, Mao Tsi Tung and Pol Pot did, I think we already know that you place little or no meaning or value on human life.

 

Good grief you're a bellend. laugh.png

 

Is that the best counter argument you can come up with? Profanity and insult? This is the problem with atheists who have turned their backs on the creator, they lose all caring for their fellow man as they attempt to destroy the community spirits created by generations of spiritual leadership inspired by the creator. Mankind can only work together and live peacefully when it has a common grounding and appreciation for the cosmos that created us with a purpose. When that purpose is lost amonst selfish and uncaring attitudes like yours, with no tolerance for your fellow human beings, it results in misery for others, but as an atheist you wouldn't care about that.

 

And the problem with some people who have absolute belief and trust that God is as real as night following day is that SOME believe that non-believers are incapable or unwilling or unable to follow a perfectly good and moral lifestyle.

 

They are.

 

But they only do because our society is so heavily influenced by Judeo-Christian philosophy and morals. And whilst there can be some good atheists because of this, they are simultaneously destroying that moral philosophy so that future generations will be deprived of it, and once that happens there will be nothing to stop the next genocidal leader from wiping out entire races.

 

Right, because religious people never commit atrocities. Pull the other one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

There's been like 5 threads on atheism and morality in the last year. It comes down to mutual respect. If you wouldn't want it to happen to you, don't do it to someone else! Dead simple stuff. Fortunately most people are capable of following this rule of thumb.

As for a meaning to life - why do you need one? Have as much fun as you can without negatively impacting anyone else's ability to have a nice life. Crackin'.

And as the next question is always "Don't you fear death?" - No. I fear not living enough.

No, there haven't; there has been approximately ONE thread on that topic. The topic of my thread is about the meaning of life. It was a call for people to think about the meaning of life and how that ties in with the social and economic order in which we live; it was not a call for atheist fundamentalists to come and gatecrash the thread and preach their pseudointellectual crap about there being no meaning to life. Thanks, after what Stalin, Mao Tsi Tung and Pol Pot did, I think we already know that you place little or no meaning or value on human life.

 

Good grief you're a bellend. laugh.png

 

Is that the best counter argument you can come up with? Profanity and insult? This is the problem with atheists who have turned their backs on the creator, they lose all caring for their fellow man as they attempt to destroy the community spirits created by generations of spiritual leadership inspired by the creator. Mankind can only work together and live peacefully when it has a common grounding and appreciation for the cosmos that created us with a purpose. When that purpose is lost amonst selfish and uncaring attitudes like yours, with no tolerance for your fellow human beings, it results in misery for others, but as an atheist you wouldn't care about that.

 

And the problem with some people who have absolute belief and trust that God is as real as night following day is that SOME believe that non-believers are incapable or unwilling or unable to follow a perfectly good and moral lifestyle.

 

They are.

 

But they only do because our society is so heavily influenced by Judeo-Christian philosophy and morals. And whilst there can be some good atheists because of this, they are simultaneously destroying that moral philosophy so that future generations will be deprived of it, and once that happens there will be nothing to stop the next genocidal leader from wiping out entire races.

 

Right, because religious people never commit atrocities. Pull the other one.

 

Not truly religious people, those that believe in love and spirituality. They cannot be truly religious to commit those atrocities, so they must be by definition atheist. There are many atrocities carried out by those pretending to be religious, but they are atheists who do it to destroy community spirit and further the atheist agenda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There's been like 5 threads on atheism and morality in the last year. It comes down to mutual respect. If you wouldn't want it to happen to you, don't do it to someone else! Dead simple stuff. Fortunately most people are capable of following this rule of thumb.

As for a meaning to life - why do you need one? Have as much fun as you can without negatively impacting anyone else's ability to have a nice life. Crackin'.

And as the next question is always "Don't you fear death?" - No. I fear not living enough.

No, there haven't; there has been approximately ONE thread on that topic. The topic of my thread is about the meaning of life. It was a call for people to think about the meaning of life and how that ties in with the social and economic order in which we live; it was not a call for atheist fundamentalists to come and gatecrash the thread and preach their pseudointellectual crap about there being no meaning to life. Thanks, after what Stalin, Mao Tsi Tung and Pol Pot did, I think we already know that you place little or no meaning or value on human life.

 

Good grief you're a bellend. laugh.png

 

Is that the best counter argument you can come up with? Profanity and insult? This is the problem with atheists who have turned their backs on the creator, they lose all caring for their fellow man as they attempt to destroy the community spirits created by generations of spiritual leadership inspired by the creator. Mankind can only work together and live peacefully when it has a common grounding and appreciation for the cosmos that created us with a purpose. When that purpose is lost amonst selfish and uncaring attitudes like yours, with no tolerance for your fellow human beings, it results in misery for others, but as an atheist you wouldn't care about that.

 

And the problem with some people who have absolute belief and trust that God is as real as night following day is that SOME believe that non-believers are incapable or unwilling or unable to follow a perfectly good and moral lifestyle.

 

They are.

 

But they only do because our society is so heavily influenced by Judeo-Christian philosophy and morals. And whilst there can be some good atheists because of this, they are simultaneously destroying that moral philosophy so that future generations will be deprived of it, and once that happens there will be nothing to stop the next genocidal leader from wiping out entire races.

 

Right, because religious people never commit atrocities. Pull the other one.

 

Not truly religious people, those that believe in love and spirituality. They cannot be truly religious to commit those atrocities, so they must be by definition atheist. There are many atrocities carried out by those pretending to be religious, but they are atheists who do it to destroy community spirit and further the atheist agenda.

 

That's a whole lot of pulling things out of your arse. What about the witch hunts? They were in the name of religion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There's been like 5 threads on atheism and morality in the last year. It comes down to mutual respect. If you wouldn't want it to happen to you, don't do it to someone else! Dead simple stuff. Fortunately most people are capable of following this rule of thumb.

As for a meaning to life - why do you need one? Have as much fun as you can without negatively impacting anyone else's ability to have a nice life. Crackin'.

And as the next question is always "Don't you fear death?" - No. I fear not living enough.

No, there haven't; there has been approximately ONE thread on that topic. The topic of my thread is about the meaning of life. It was a call for people to think about the meaning of life and how that ties in with the social and economic order in which we live; it was not a call for atheist fundamentalists to come and gatecrash the thread and preach their pseudointellectual crap about there being no meaning to life. Thanks, after what Stalin, Mao Tsi Tung and Pol Pot did, I think we already know that you place little or no meaning or value on human life.

 

Good grief you're a bellend. laugh.png

 

Is that the best counter argument you can come up with? Profanity and insult? This is the problem with atheists who have turned their backs on the creator, they lose all caring for their fellow man as they attempt to destroy the community spirits created by generations of spiritual leadership inspired by the creator. Mankind can only work together and live peacefully when it has a common grounding and appreciation for the cosmos that created us with a purpose. When that purpose is lost amonst selfish and uncaring attitudes like yours, with no tolerance for your fellow human beings, it results in misery for others, but as an atheist you wouldn't care about that.

 

And the problem with some people who have absolute belief and trust that God is as real as night following day is that SOME believe that non-believers are incapable or unwilling or unable to follow a perfectly good and moral lifestyle.

 

They are.

 

But they only do because our society is so heavily influenced by Judeo-Christian philosophy and morals. And whilst there can be some good atheists because of this, they are simultaneously destroying that moral philosophy so that future generations will be deprived of it, and once that happens there will be nothing to stop the next genocidal leader from wiping out entire races.

 

Right, because religious people never commit atrocities. Pull the other one.

 

Not truly religious people, those that believe in love and spirituality. They cannot be truly religious to commit those atrocities, so they must be by definition atheist. There are many atrocities carried out by those pretending to be religious, but they are atheists who do it to destroy community spirit and further the atheist agenda.

 

That's a whole lot of pulling things out of your arse. What about the witch hunts? They were in the name of religion.

 

Again they were carried out by atheists who were trying to rid the world of so called "witchcraft" which is just the name they gave to the harnessing of spiritual power that used to be common practice. Atheists have managed to eradicate this power in the main, to the extent that those who now claim to be at one with the universe are ridiculed and ostracised from mainstream society. Further evidenec of the atheist eradication of spiritualism that is essential for a healthy community.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

those " not truly" religious people, who must be default atheists because they commit atrocities cannot be true atheists, they must be closet deity worshippers who secretly believe they have a divine mandate to kill others, because true atheists would never do such things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

those " not truly" religious people, who must be default atheists because they commit atrocities cannot be true atheists, they must be closet deity worshippers who secretly believe they have a divine mandate to kill others, because true atheists would never do such things.

 

Incorrect. Only true atheists have turned their backs on the spiritual frequencies that the universe transmits into the collective human subconsience. Truly religious people who base their philosophies on this spirituality know instinctively that to harm others is against the nature of the universe. Atheists have rejected this in their pursuit of selfish gain at the expense of others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

those " not truly" religious people, who must be default atheists because they commit atrocities cannot be true atheists, they must be closet deity worshippers who secretly believe they have a divine mandate to kill others, because true atheists would never do such things.

 

Incorrect. Only true atheists have turned their backs on the spiritual frequencies that the universe transmits into the collective human subconsience. Truly religious people who base their philosophies on this spirituality know instinctively that to harm others is against the nature of the universe. Atheists have rejected this in their pursuit of selfish gain at the expense of others.

 

 

We don't really worry about those people, people who harm others can't be true atheists, so they must be one of your lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

those " not truly" religious people, who must be default atheists because they commit atrocities cannot be true atheists, they must be closet deity worshippers who secretly believe they have a divine mandate to kill others, because true atheists would never do such things.

Incorrect. Only true atheists have turned their backs on the spiritual frequencies that the universe transmits into the collective human subconsience. Truly religious people who base their philosophies on this spirituality know instinctively that to harm others is against the nature of the universe. Atheists have rejected this in their pursuit of selfish gain at the expense of others.

 

I know it's wrong to harm others, and yet I don't have to subscribe to some batty theory about frequencies transmitted by magic. And no, make whatever assertion you want, but most atrocities in history were committed by religious people. Just because some of them didn't ascribe to YOUR notion of religion doesn't make them not religious, and it doesn't make you the arbiter of what is and isn't religion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a load of tripe.

 

There are civilisations that have no association with Judio-Christian morality who have developed decent moral codes.

 

Now if The Lord made his will known to these people other than He did to the Jews but the circumstances were not recorded will be moot, but to accuse atheists of being in some way incapable of living to their own code based on humanism that is just as moral as Jewish or Christian people is plainly rubbish.

 

Christianity is about a very great deal more than simply setting out a set of rules, especially as some of the rules other than the Decalogue were patently obviously changed over the years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

those " not truly" religious people, who must be default atheists because they commit atrocities cannot be true atheists, they must be closet deity worshippers who secretly believe they have a divine mandate to kill others, because true atheists would never do such things.

 

Incorrect. Only true atheists have turned their backs on the spiritual frequencies that the universe transmits into the collective human subconsience. Truly religious people who base their philosophies on this spirituality know instinctively that to harm others is against the nature of the universe. Atheists have rejected this in their pursuit of selfish gain at the expense of others.

 

Utter clap trap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

those " not truly" religious people, who must be default atheists because they commit atrocities cannot be true atheists, they must be closet deity worshippers who secretly believe they have a divine mandate to kill others, because true atheists would never do such things.

Incorrect. Only true atheists have turned their backs on the spiritual frequencies that the universe transmits into the collective human subconsience. Truly religious people who base their philosophies on this spirituality know instinctively that to harm others is against the nature of the universe. Atheists have rejected this in their pursuit of selfish gain at the expense of others.

 

Utter clap trap.

 

I think someone has spent too much time eating the mushrooms he finds in the woods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

those " not truly" religious people, who must be default atheists because they commit atrocities cannot be true atheists, they must be closet deity worshippers who secretly believe they have a divine mandate to kill others, because true atheists would never do such things.

Incorrect. Only true atheists have turned their backs on the spiritual frequencies that the universe transmits into the collective human subconsience. Truly religious people who base their philosophies on this spirituality know instinctively that to harm others is against the nature of the universe. Atheists have rejected this in their pursuit of selfish gain at the expense of others.

 

I know it's wrong to harm others, and yet I don't have to subscribe to some batty theory about frequencies transmitted by magic. And no, make whatever assertion you want, but most atrocities in history were committed by religious people. Just because some of them didn't ascribe to YOUR notion of religion doesn't make them not religious, and it doesn't make you the arbiter of what is and isn't religion.

 

 

But you only know that it's wrong to harm others because of the Judeo-Christian moral philosophies that have sculptured the society that you grew up in. Once you and your fellow atheists have wiped out that philosophy it will be a free for all of violence and horror.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...