spook Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 The "Scottish Bitch" is in Scotland, you are in Norfolk. Cant see that she is a problem for you! It depends if Labour go into some forms of coalition with the Scottish equivalent of the BNP. If that happens there can be no doubt that the SNP would demand that even more English tax payers money would end up as foreign aid to North of the border. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevster Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 The "Scottish Bitch" is in Scotland, you are in Norfolk. Cant see that she is a problem for you! It depends if Labour go into some forms of coalition with the Scottish equivalent of the BNP. If that happens there can be no doubt that the SNP would demand that even more English tax payers money would end up as foreign aid to North of the border. Well there's not the slightest chance 'the Scottish Bitch' will be on the green benches after the election Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Down Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 I have now listened to the interview - I'm sorry Wann but you and I must have listened to a different interview, to me she had nothing of substance to say. She has now changed her LinkedIn profile to show that she actually stopped working for Poker stars in 2011 rather than 2015. One thing that does confuse me is that the same profile claims she worked for Online Casino's from 2011 to April 2015. (I have a copy of the newly updated profile too) Her husband claimed only a couple of months ago (I think a screen print of which is available on this thread) that she earns more money through her job than an MHK So why did she say on the radio this morning, when questioned about being a homemaker, that during the "past few years it was better for her to stay at home and raise my child than not be there full time" I have no problem with stay at home mums I have no problems with working mums I do have a problem when people don't tell the truth to suit their purposes though. Which is it Amy? Which is correct - your LinkedIn profile or your claim that you are a homemaker? I noticed that as well. She is telling porkies! Methinks the girl is that twisted she would have trouble laying in bed at night. Most of her comments are normally followed by responses from her husband. Possibly a younger version of the Malarkeys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.K. Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 I read that thread yesterday. In the main, it's appalling. The woman, her looks, her appearance, her family, her background, ripped to shreds. I'm all for straight talking but that thread is a disgrace and does MF no favours at all. It wasn't MFs finest hour although it's debatable as to how much of it was untrue. So MF makes a bad enemy. So what? From what I've seen her putting herself in the public eye, where you have to be prepared to take for the team some real (and possibly true) biting and hurtful criticism, could be a big mistake. Face it, with her background she's a very easy target.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Border Terrier Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 Just listened to her on mandate...not a woman of substance. I got no idea what her policies/priorities might be. >I got no idea what her policies/priorities might be. No matter Albert, neither does she. But following on from her "doctor's should be at the hospital" analogy, should the "homemaker" be in politics? I think she'd be great copy with lots of ridiculous quotes...and probably an early, spectacular meltdown. But not what the IoM needs at the present. The vulnerable really do need help right now and she's no idea how best to give it. In fact, I think she'd be a hindrance. Perhaps she could stand as a Councillor first and deal with dog mess, chewing gum, street lights, Mayor's parlour drinks budget etc. see how she perseveres with that? Sorry Amy, however well intentioned (for now), you're just not good enough. If I were a betting man rather than a voter, maybe Malarkey (pictured...right) as an outside bet. TBT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wann Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 I watched some of the MTTV interviews. Malarkey here: http://www.manx.net/tv/mt-tv/watch/71887/douglas-south-bill-malarkey It seems he wasn't happy with the way LibVan were doing things. Most noteably it seems by not supporting the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA). I'm not sure if that actually is the case, but whatever. CPA = trips around the world. This is the icing on the cake for our Tynwald guys and some long termers can travel the corners of the world to some very exotic places too. All in the name of forging links or whatever. And at the taxpayers expense. These are the copper bottomed jollys for the members of Tynwald and some hangers on too. Malarkey clearly wanted (and still wants) all the trimmings that came with being an MHK and that included the parties and perks. LibVan got him in, but only half way there, so he clearly decided to take the gamble of 4 years or so in with the big boys and dumped LibVan. Then in a nicely cruel twist of fate, he was beaten at the next general election by a LibVan candidate. I would like to see this "electrical engineer" and "company director" fixing washing machines and stuff for at least the next five years, not sucking up to the Council of Ministers and sliding in with the establishment to satisfy his own ego and peculiar sense of self imnportance. And not making decisions that effect my life in any way and not taking taxpayers money for his pay and pension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asitis Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 I'd choose the bright looking one ( Pictured left) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j2bad Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 Any one got some dirt on Keith Fitton or is he actually a decent person? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Down Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 If you keep an eye on her profiles, you will notice a trend whereby when people are commenting about her she suddenly discovers a "bullying" post on one of her many fakebook profiles. Can't wait to see her in the House of Keys. She should slot right in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Down Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 Any one got some dirt on Keith Fitton or is he actually a decent person? He once picked his nose in the privacy of his own home Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Tatlock Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 Most people that put their head above the parapet in WW1 and WW2...got shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 Just listened to her on mandate...not a woman of substance. I got no idea what her policies/priorities might be. All I heard was waffle. I was amazed at her intensions to stop all the poverty though, as I am not aware of any. Gave the impression that we have loads of "poor" ( because she read it in the census) and because she was just an ordinary person, that is what the poor need to rid them of all this poverty. Really ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freggyragh Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 Some of the posters on here need to take a long hard look at themselves. Our political representation is dominated by old male careerist politicians with one eye on a cushy retirement. Along comes someone different, and you devote a thread to mostly attacking her looks, gender and social profile, digging up stuff off social media and mocking her for being different. You are going to put off anyone but the blandest and dullest from putting themselves forward next year. I don't know much about Amy, or much about her politics, but good luck to her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dilligaf Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 Some of the posters on here need to take a long hard look at themselves. Our political representation is dominated by old male careerist politicians with one eye on a cushy retirement. Along comes someone different, and you devote a thread to mostly attacking her looks, gender and social profile, digging up stuff off social media and mocking her for being different. You are going to put off anyone but the blandest and dullest from putting themselves forward next year. I don't know much about Amy, or much about her politics, but good luck to her. Obviously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merkin Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 I thought she did well in the interview, although she didn't get any really gruelling questions. The MTTV guy gave Ralph Peake much more of a hard time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.