Lxxx Posted April 13, 2018 Share Posted April 13, 2018 20 hours ago, the stinking enigma said: Yes. It was never about regime change. It was about stopping isis. Until silly billy assad used chemical weapons again just as he was about to win again. What a fool he must be. Him and Putin are idiots aren't they. They almost seem to be always trying to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lxxx Posted April 13, 2018 Share Posted April 13, 2018 Syria is one of the last secular states in the region. Just like Iraq was to a degree under Saddam. It seems like we always want to topple such stable countries to leave behind anarchy, destruction and Islamic zealots to move into the vacuum. Chaos is good for business and it would appear to the layman we're working with the zealots to bring this about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rog Posted April 13, 2018 Share Posted April 13, 2018 5 hours ago, pongo said: The so-what is that you are arguing that Assad is some sort of bulwark against terrorism when in reality his family's regime has backed Islamic terrorism for decades. I'm not arguing for regime change. I'm arguing only against blustering bombast. And against pointlessly choosing sides as if it were a horse race. Times change and for a number of years the Assad regime HAVE been a bulwark against fully observant Moslems who use terrorism (the sword) as a means of spreading their rotten cult. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pongo Posted April 13, 2018 Share Posted April 13, 2018 2 minutes ago, Rog said: Times change and for a number of years the Assad regime HAVE been a bulwark against fully observant Moslems who use terrorism (the sword) as a means of spreading their rotten cult. Syria and Iran are behind both Hamas and Hezbollah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rog Posted April 13, 2018 Share Posted April 13, 2018 4 minutes ago, pongo said: Syria and Iran are behind both Hamas and Hezbollah. In the Middle East alliances change like the weather but always Islam is at the heart of war, killing, injury, and theft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doc.fixit Posted April 13, 2018 Share Posted April 13, 2018 ....a bit like the old British Empiricists and other nations killing indigenous populations and taking over the countries they invaded?......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rog Posted April 13, 2018 Share Posted April 13, 2018 1 hour ago, Lxxx said: Him and Putin are idiots aren't they. They almost seem to be always trying to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. The assumption you and others make is that the chemical attacks were the work of the Assad regime assisted by Russia. IMO that makes no sense. Much more likely is that the attacks have been made by the terrorists in order to turn the West even more against the Assad regime which is precisely what happened. Keep in mind that those that were killed would immediately become "Shahid" (martyrs), in this case because of their the war against the infidel, and so go immediately to "paradise" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rog Posted April 13, 2018 Share Posted April 13, 2018 6 minutes ago, doc.fixit said: ....a bit like the old British Empiricists and other nations killing indigenous populations and taking over the countries they invaded?......... No, there was very little of that took place, although the way that genocide was at the heart of the creation of the good 'ol USA should never be forgotten. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sausages Posted April 13, 2018 Share Posted April 13, 2018 Russian military says Britain carried out the chemical attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sausages Posted April 13, 2018 Share Posted April 13, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballaughbiker Posted April 13, 2018 Share Posted April 13, 2018 Quote Russian military says Britain carried out the chemical attack. And there will be a million or two Russia today devotees who will readily believe it whilst disbelieving news sources based all over Europe. C'est la vie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doc.fixit Posted April 13, 2018 Share Posted April 13, 2018 2 hours ago, Rog said: No, there was very little of that took place, although the way that genocide was at the heart of the creation of the good 'ol USA should never be forgotten. ............and the Bushmen of the Kalahari and the Australian Aborigonals and the Zulus and the............. although I take your point that the current crop of Islamists haven't been able to follow that course even though they may be achieving that outcome by stealth and infiltration.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted April 13, 2018 Share Posted April 13, 2018 3 hours ago, ballaughbiker said: And there will be a million or two Russia today devotees who will readily believe it whilst disbelieving news sources based all over Europe. C'est la vie. this will really confuse you then. the trusty sky news but rebroadcast on rt. at which point does it become fake? https://www.rt.com/news/424078-sky-news-general-shaw/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted April 13, 2018 Share Posted April 13, 2018 that's a general with 30 years service ballaugh biker. you are a biker from ballaugh. do you expect he too formed his opinion from watching rt and believing everything he saw? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballaughbiker Posted April 13, 2018 Share Posted April 13, 2018 Yeah stinky. Isn't it confusing that only rt.com is reporting this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.