Jump to content

Donald Trump


cropduster

Recommended Posts

On 06/11/2017 at 3:54 PM, Tibet said:

It has emerged from his social media activities that he is a bigoted proponent of atheism and very hostile towards Christians and the Christian religion.

Probably was inspired to take action given that Antifa and other George Soros funded groups were pushing for a revolution this week in celebration of the 100th anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution.

Are you honest enough to acknowledge this isn’t true?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RIchard Britten said:

I mean, if the wall was ever going to happen they'd have to use Eminent Domain anyway (which it isn't),  so it's just cards against humanity doing their usual publicity stunt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RIchard Britten said:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/nov/14/nigel-farage-withdraws-claim-hope-not-hate-high-court

And another victory against another repugnant ball sack on legs...

go sir nige....

Quote

But the fact is that a number of individuals claiming to support them have in the past behaved violently and sought to intimidate and disrupt lawful political meetings. This is a case Hope not Hate should never have brought and which has been a complete waste of their donors’ money.

“Despite them demanding up to £100,000 in damages, I have not paid them a penny; they demanded an apology that I have not given; and they demanded an undertaking to the court which they did not get.

“In addition, they have been forced to pay me thousands in costs, on top of the tens of thousands they will have had to pay for their own legal fees.”

hardly what you would call a win:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, woody2 said:

go sir nige....

hardly what you would call a win:lol:

Read the whole article...

Get to the bit where the actual facts are rather than the Farage facts:

"Hope not Hate said Farage had fully covered his own legal costs, apart from a half-day administrative hearing where the two parties split the costs between them. The group said Farage was left with costs of around £100,000.

Lowles said of Farage’s statement: “He’s picking at straws and trying to find any crumb of comfort; this is not a victory for him, it’s a humiliation.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RIchard Britten said:

Read the whole article...

Get to the bit where the actual facts are rather than the Farage facts:

"Hope not Hate said Farage had fully covered his own legal costs, apart from a half-day administrative hearing where the two parties split the costs between them. The group said Farage was left with costs of around £100,000.

Lowles said of Farage’s statement: “He’s picking at straws and trying to find any crumb of comfort; this is not a victory for him, it’s a humiliation.”

they would say that, farage paid no costs and received money from them, no order made, win for sir nige....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...