Tarne Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 (edited) Ooh he's not used to not getting his own way, he's writing in ALL CAPS do he must be angry. This is an interesting example of checks and Balances Edit: referring to his latest tweet after him losing the travel ban appeal. Edited February 10, 2017 by Tarne 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 and well below its 52 week highAnd up on its 18 month high.nope yep nope Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbie Bobster Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 and well below its 52 week highAnd up on its 18 month high. nope yep nope woody2 needs a new calculator. Sad! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 and well below its 52 week highAnd up on its 18 month high. nope yep nope woody2 needs a new calculator. Sad! you need to learn how share prices work Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbie Bobster Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 woody2 needs a new calculator. Sad!you need to learn how share prices work They can go up as well as down, didn't you know Probably best you stick to this investment scheme: 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarne Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 For all the liberal whining about Trump, he's been in power less than a month and you've found his weakness - he is not used to checks and balances. Use that against him, rather than screaming "impeach, impeach" like retarded children. As for nordstroms shares it's not hard to check, 52 week low of 35, max of 62. Current 45. Probably worth a punt actually and see where it ends up around Xmas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 As for nordstroms shares it's not hard to check, 52 week low of 35, max of 62. Current 45. Probably worth a punt actually and see where it ends up around Xmas And up on its 18 month high yet the old man thinks its higher now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmanx Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 i see the libtards are not objecting to the new limit of 50000, wonder when they will start campaigning against kuwait who have the same ban, or is it ok for the libtards as its a muslim majority country....... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmanx Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/feb/07/donald-trump/donald-trump-wrong-say-kuwait-followed-his-lead-vi/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 fake rturd news Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 rmanx' link to Politifact is actually quite interesting. Their conclusion: Our ruling On Facebook, Trump said, "Smart! 'Kuwait issues its own Trump-esque visa ban for five Muslim-majority countries.' " That’s wrong -- news coverage suggests that Kuwait implemented a visa ban on a half-dozen predominantly Muslim nations in 2011, six years before Trump took office. Meanwhile, any argument that Kuwait’s past actions indicate a like-minded approach between Trump and Kuwait sidesteps the reality that pursuing such a policy in the United States inevitably has a much bigger impact because the U.S., unlike Kuwait, allows a path to citizenship for legal immigrants. We rate the statement Mostly False. ...seems to question a matter of timing rather than fact. In other words, Kuwait did it first although for similar reasons. I am not sure what the second paragraph proves. If anything it says that there is more justification for the ban in the US because you could finish up with those aliens as citizens whereas that isn't the case in Kuwait. It doesn't appear to have been written with an even hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 ...seems to question a matter of timing rather than fact. In other words, Kuwait did it first although for similar reasons. I am not sure what the second paragraph proves. If anything it says that there is more justification for the ban in the US because you could finish up with those aliens as citizens whereas that isn't the case in Kuwait. It doesn't appear to have been written with an even hand. that was my understanding, beeb mentioned it before the election..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmanx Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 3-0... Chortle... "SEE YOU IN COURT!!!" "LAWFARE..." Reminds of a less than kindly mad old "billionaire" that lived here until not so long ago... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 (edited) this is all good news for trump Edited February 10, 2017 by woody2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.