Jump to content

American Presidential Elections 2016


Chinahand

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 835
  • Created
  • Last Reply

So ... should the UK be taking Trumps suggestion of Nigel Farage being the UK's ambassador to the US seriously?

 

Trump - micromanaging diplomacy, telling an ally to appoint his friends to work for them, putting the current ambassador in an impossible diplomatic position, and guaranteeing either his suggestion is snubbed, or he shows over-bearing leaverage over an ally.

 

Wonderful diplomatic skills - all done via Twitter. FFS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So ... should the UK be taking Trumps suggestion of Nigel Farage being the UK's ambassador to the US seriously?

 

Trump - micromanaging diplomacy, telling an ally to appoint his friends to work for them, putting the current ambassador in an impossible diplomatic position, and guaranteeing either his suggestion is snubbed, or he shows over-bearing leaverage over an ally.

 

Wonderful diplomatic skills - all done via Twitter. FFS.

 

Farage needs a bit of diplomatic experience first, say as Trade attaché to Uzbekistan for 4 or 5 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The mess that has been made of Western countries is entirely down to the liberal agendas followed for the past 50 years. That, and that alone, is the cause of the rise of extremism. This is the inevitable backlash, not the cause.

I don't think you could accuse Reagan, Bush or Thatcher of following liberal agendas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The mess that has been made of Western countries is entirely down to the liberal agendas followed for the past 50 years. That, and that alone, is the cause of the rise of extremism. This is the inevitable backlash, not the cause.

I don't think you could accuse Reagan, Bush or Thatcher of following liberal agendas.

 

They did socially and on law and order. Not financially.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

The mess that has been made of Western countries is entirely down to the liberal agendas followed for the past 50 years. That, and that alone, is the cause of the rise of extremism. This is the inevitable backlash, not the cause.

I don't think you could accuse Reagan, Bush or Thatcher of following liberal agendas.

 

They did socially and on law and order. Not financially.

 

 

Your broken record is starting to skip and it is starting to sound like bollocks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And it is Doublethink to blame the raise of intolerance and hatred on people who's central belief is tolerance and respect for one's fellow man, and living to together peacefully, and sorting out our differences by talking and compromise.

 

It's not Liberals that are signing up to ISIS, it's not liberals that preach race hate or building walls between nations or trying to tear apart bonds of friendship and alliances between nations. It's the people who believe in hate and division that are doing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd call flooding their countries with immigrants and permitting strict adherence to law and order to go out the window, embracing human rights legislation and in the case of the UK, submission to the jurisdiction of foreign courts pretty liberal. Wouldn't you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And it is Doublethink to blame the raise of intolerance and hatred on people who's central belief is tolerance and respect for one's fellow man, and living to together peacefully, and sorting out our differences by talking and compromise.

 

It's not Liberals that are signing up to ISIS, it's not liberals that preach race hate or building walls between nations or trying to tear apart bonds of friendship and alliances between nations. It's the people who believe in hate and division that are doing it.

Never heard of cause and effect? It is indeed a backlash and a rejection of the societies that have been created and the forces of liberalism and capitalism that created them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

And it is Doublethink to blame the raise of intolerance and hatred on people who's central belief is tolerance and respect for one's fellow man, and living to together peacefully, and sorting out our differences by talking and compromise.

 

It's not Liberals that are signing up to ISIS, it's not liberals that preach race hate or building walls between nations or trying to tear apart bonds of friendship and alliances between nations. It's the people who believe in hate and division that are doing it.

Never heard of cause and effect? It is indeed a backlash and a rejection of the societies that have been created and the forces of liberalism and capitalism that created them.

 

 

And nothing to do with out aggressive foreign policies, austerity measures for the poor while the rich get richer and our being turned against ourselves by self interested demagogues?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...