Jump to content

Fidel Castro RIP


llap

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Castro - typical totalitarian socialist - shot or imprisoned those who disagreed with him and so created a climate of fear so no one would openly defy him. Seized private property and hence destroyed incentives, enforced a command economy which sapped the economy of strength, while blaming the US for every problem. The result poverty and corruption where you need a government permit to do anything, but where if you had the contacts and the bribes you could do what you wanted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Castro - typical totalitarian socialist - shot or imprisoned those who disagreed with him and so created a climate of fear so no one would openly defy him. Seized private property and hence destroyed incentives, enforced a command economy which sapped the economy of strength, while blaming the US for every problem. The result poverty and corruption where you need a government permit to do anything, but where if you had the contacts and the bribes you could do what you wanted.

 

Sorry, but the terms "totalitarian" and "socialist" are mutually exclusive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Castro - typical totalitarian socialist - shot or imprisoned those who disagreed with him and so created a climate of fear so no one would openly defy him. Seized private property and hence destroyed incentives, enforced a command economy which sapped the economy of strength, while blaming the US for every problem. The result poverty and corruption where you need a government permit to do anything, but where if you had the contacts and the bribes you could do what you wanted.

 

Sorry, but the terms "totalitarian" and "socialist" are mutually exclusive.

 

 

So what was the USSR then, under Uncle Joe ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Sorry, but the terms "totalitarian" and "socialist" are mutually exclusive.

 

 

So what was the USSR then, under Uncle Joe ?

 

 

A totalitarian state. Just because a country calls itself socialist, doesn't mean it is. The "R" also stands for Republic; by no stretch of the imagination were they a republic either. Calling the Soviet Union "socialist" was propaganda: positive propaganda on the part of the Soviet Union itself in claiming to be socialist, and negative propaganda by the United States in trying to demonise the Soviet Union (and, in doing so, demonise socialism). But they weren't socialist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Castro - typical totalitarian socialist

 

Sorry, but the terms "totalitarian" and "socialist" are mutually exclusive.

Pedant, Castro enforced socialism - he shot land lords and entrepreneurs and enforced state control over not only the economy but most aspects of people's lives. You had to be either very brave or very foolish to defy him as you were likely to end up imprisioned or dead as a result.

 

Playing the pedant while ignoring the reality of revolutionary socialism may float your boat but it was an inhuman ideology which crushed and killed those who disagreed with it. The word totalitarian fits perfectly well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh the no true Scotsman argument for socialism.

 

These regimes took the means of production under state control and used the planned command economy to provide for people's means rather than a market system.

 

That's a pretty good definition of socialism and how it is contrasted with capitalism - state control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, folks, but you appear to be confusing COMMUNISM and SOCIALISM.

 

There is nothing socialist about the reality of totalitarian dictatorship. You can't enforce socialism from above, like a benevolent dictator. Socialism is about communities making decisions for themselves, e.g. workings owning the means of production. The idea of a centralised state power running society or the state owning the means of production is not socialist at all -- that's totalitarian communism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Castro - typical totalitarian socialist - shot or imprisoned those who disagreed with him and so created a climate of fear so no one would openly defy him. Seized private property and hence destroyed incentives, enforced a command economy which sapped the economy of strength, while blaming the US for every problem. The result poverty and corruption where you need a government permit to do anything, but where if you had the contacts and the bribes you could do what you wanted.

 

His policies remind me of Mugabe...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...