Jump to content

So the UK is finished says Theresa Mayhem


fatshaft

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, Rog said:

Bercow redefined the scope and responsibilities that are the the basis of the role of Mr Speaker.  BoJo is showing that he is the very best PM since Mrs Thatcher. 

A major, if not THE major role of a Prime Minister is to demonstrate a duty of care to ALL citizens of the UK.

The outpourings of sheer hatred and disgust at her demise by a large part of the UK population demonstrated all too clearly how Thatcher completely failed in this crucial role as a leader.

Her legacy was a country polarised by her toxic policies.

Now brexit has polarised the country as well only along different faultlines. Can totally amoral narcissistic serial philanderer and inveterate liar Boris Johnson, our actual Prime Minister, generate more venom than Thatcher with his totally stupid and completely unnecessary Brexit?

You know what, I believe he can.

But you won't see it foment until probably 2021 at the earliest....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, P.K. said:

A major, if not THE major role of a Prime Minister is to demonstrate a duty of care to ALL citizens of the UK.

The outpourings of sheer hatred and disgust at her demise by a large part of the UK population demonstrated all too clearly how Thatcher completely failed in this crucial role as a leader.

Her legacy was a country polarised by her toxic policies.

Now brexit has polarised the country as well only along different faultlines. Can totally amoral narcissistic serial philanderer and inveterate liar Boris Johnson, our actual Prime Minister, generate more venom than Thatcher with his totally stupid and completely unnecessary Brexit?

You know what, I believe he can.

But you won't see it foment until probably 2021 at the earliest....

It's not BREXIT that polarised the UK population, it's those demonstrating the Stockholm syndrome and those who want freedom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Non-Believer said:

When we're dealing with an equally nasty fascist outlook it's bound to sooner or later.

I sincerely doubt if most people know what fascism is.  They confuse national pride with fascism though the two are actually poles apart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Rog said:

It's not BREXIT that polarised the UK population, it's those demonstrating the Stockholm syndrome and those who want freedom.

BS.

Freedom from what? Being ground under the iron heel of the EU?

Stuff and nonsense. All the central planks of your precious brexit have been roundly and soundly rubbished time and time again.

Notice you didn't try and defend the indefensible that was Thatcher's tenure.

Very sensible...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, P.K. said:

BS.

Freedom from what? Being ground under the iron heel of the EU?

Stuff and nonsense. All the central planks of your precious brexit have been roundly and soundly rubbished time and time again.

Notice you didn't try and defend the indefensible that was Thatcher's tenure.

Very sensible...

The government of Mrs Thatcher saved the UK from total collapse and cut the power of the traitorous trade unions.

She and her government did what had to be done. Like a surgeon cutting out a malignancy there was initially pain but the patient recovered and thrived.  Thank goodness the idiom "cometh the hour cometh the man" came true again and we have BoJo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, P.K. said:

BS.

Freedom from what? Being ground under the iron heel of the EU?

Stuff and nonsense. All the central planks of your precious brexit have been roundly and soundly rubbished time and time again.

Notice you didn't try and defend the indefensible that was Thatcher's tenure.

Very sensible...

I will come to the defence of Thatcher and the Brexit decision.

1. Thatcher, having won three elections with the biggest majorities in UK history is a winner. She was, as a matter of fact not conjecture, a massive winner, not a loser. Corbyn, Foot, Kinnock, Brown and Miliband were losers - The five of them did not win an election between them, Thatcher won three on her own.

2. Brexit, with the biggest positive vote for anything in UK voting history is a winner.

You, fighting against Thatcher, Fighting against Brexit, and having lost both (big, big, style) are a Loser

You cannot compute that, you cannot get that, you cannot accept that. 

That is why, and because, you are a loser.

Tell your kids that - you introduced them into the discussion, not me.

Tell them, why every political forecast you make always puts you on the losing side!

I don't want to rub it in, I really don't, but don't tell me that Thatcher and Brexiteers are losers and you are a winner when the very opposite is true.

You lost, you are are loser, change horses or get over it.

I'm guessing that you will now attack me personally rather than dealing with the above facts. Take the invective out of it, make it a simple betting company analysis, you claim that Thatcher is a loser (even with the benefit of hindsight!!!) when she was a massive electoral winner (proven).You claim that Brexiteers are losers when facts show them to be the winners.

What odds would you get from a bettng company for your claim that Thatcher and Brexiteers are losers and Corbyn plus Remainers are in fact winners. Are you mad?

It is indeed possible to deny certain truths for a while, but eventually the actual truth will out. 

Thatcher was a winner not a loser, Remainers have lost. A sensible man would go quietly into the night.

Edited by Manximus Aururaneus
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Manximus Aururaneus said:

I will come to the defence of Thatcher and the Brexit decision.

1. Thatcher, having won three elections with the biggest majorities in UK history is a winner. She was, as a matter of fact not conjecture, a massive winner, not a loser. Corbyn, Foot, Kinnock, Brown and Miliband were losers - The five of them did not win an election between them, Thatcher won three on her own.

2. Brexit, with the biggest positive vote for anything in UK voting history is a winner.

You, fighting against Thatcher, Fighting against Brexit, and having lost both (big, big, style) are a Loser

You cannot compute that, you cannot get that, you cannot accept that. 

That is why, and because, you are a loser.

Tell your kids that - you introduced them into the discussion, not me.

Tell them, why every political forecast you make always puts you on the losing side!

I don't want to rub it in, I really don't, but don't tell me that Thatcher and Brexiteers are losers and you are a winner when the very opposite is true.

You lost, you are are loser, change horses or get over it.

I'm guessing that you will now attack me personally rather than dealing with the above facts. Take the invective out of it, make it a simple betting company analysis, you claim that Thatcher is a loser (even with the benefit of hindsight!!!) when she was a massive electoral winner (proven).You claim that Brexiteers are losers when facts show them to be the winners.

What odds would you get from a bettng company for your claim that Thatcher and Brexiteers are losers and Corbyn plus Remainers are in fact winners. Are you mad?

It is indeed possible to deny certain truths for a while, but eventually the actual truth will out. 

Thatcher was a winner not a loser, Remainers have lost. A sensible man would go quietly into the night.

Thatchers stupid policies precipitated the Falklands Conflict.

For that and that alone she should be forever condemned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

1. Thatcher, having won three elections with the biggest majorities in UK history is a winner. 

No, Blair's 1997 majority was bigger and was the biggest since the 30s.

Quote

Brexit, with the biggest positive vote for anything in UK voting history is a winner.

Define biggest. Absolute number? Reg voters corrected number? Winners percentage?  General elections or just comparable referendums?

Sticking to referendums:

1. Absolute number? Yes, just, by about 130,000 over the 1975 referendum however there an additional 6.4m registered voters in 2016 compared to 1975

2. Reg voters corrected number? No. 1975 bigger win by about 2.3m

3. Percentage on winning side? No 51.9% in 2016, 67% in 1975

If you want to consider turnout, the 2014 Scottish referendum was by far the highest at 84% and there were more people voting in the 1992 GE than the referendum

 

2016 referendum a win for leave? Of course it was...

but do you really think patriotic remainers are going to "change horses"? That would be validating your choice and diluting your responsibility should all this goes tits up in the medium term. I pray it won't but I wouldn't bet my house on it and I doubt whether you would either.

 

Just sayin' ;)

 

(unlike you who still hasn't justified why my question to Rog yesterday was somehow a lie or what my family had to do with that question.)

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blair was indeed a winner - because as he himself confirms, he admired and copied Thatcher. Cameron in turn admired and copied Blair, it was a winning formula (albeit watered down with each transition) and Boris has now pretty much gone back to Thatcher (though is less business orientated). It points out, in a crystal clear fashion, just where the political consensus in the UK lies. It is neither extreme left or extreme right.

Remainers expecting to remain objectors to Brexit, continue to oppose and fight it, and then expect Brexit aims to be aligned to provide an outcome that suits their desires are in for disappointment - Brexiteers have no intention whatever of conducting the process in a manner best aligned to the aims of those opposing it - sorry. Brexit will be orientated towards the outcome that the Brexiteers wish for, not the outcome that remainers wish for - anyone choosing continued opposition to it is going to end up moaning for the rest of their days.

Thatcher gained a majority of 144 in the 1983 election and 109 in the 1987 election - both after the Falklands war had been conducted and therefore taken into account by the electorate.

Sorry for introducing facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Manximus Aururaneus said:

Brexit will be orientated towards the outcome that the Brexiteers wish for.

Brexiteers cannot agree on what they actually want beyond leaving the EU.  There are still divisions amongst brexiteers on what the future relationship should be.  For reference see Nigel Farage's complaint regarding the withdrawal agreement made by Boris Johnson.

I expect these divisions amongst brexiteers to come to the fore over the next 10 months.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, manxman1980 said:

Brexiteers cannot agree on what they actually want beyond leaving the EU. 

That have something to do with the fact the majority of those voting for Brexit had no bloody clue what Brexit was, what it was for or what the outcome of a Brexit would be.

A blind leap into the dark with 17.4 miliion different desired outcomes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...