Jump to content

So the UK is finished says Theresa Mayhem


fatshaft

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, P.K. said:

Hardly.

Just pointing out the facts where folks may have "misunderstood" them shall we say.

Take The Maybot. I don't like her, particularly after her really quite appalling "hostile environment" and the resulting Windrush scandal. But there's no denying her WA, courtesy of Olly Robbins and Sabine Weyand, was better than the cut-and-paste Johnson effort.

In your opinion maybe but that doesn't mean that you're right. In fact the outcome of the last general election clearly shows that the majority of the UK electorate rightly believed that she and her arse up plans for BREXIT were NOT what was wanted, we wanted BREXIT and everything that came with it at ANY price.   Likewise we didn't want any form of socialism, and the appalling antisemitism of Momentum and the Corbyn ideals just added further reasons he and the Momentum/Labour idealists were given the "Bums Rush" by the decent right thinking people.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, mojomonkey said:

They have left, hence why I said it is time to step up. Hopefully some good deals coming.

We don't NEED  EU trade deals with the European Commission.

Let's just end the far too long transition stage EARLY and walk away - and then sort out any trade deals with the whole world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Sajid Javid walks as Chancellor after refusing to (at least partly) relinquish control of Treasury to the unelected Dominic Cummings and advisors ( Sky News). Replacement stooge appointed.

Bojo's having a giraffe...

Edited by Non-Believer
Typo
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Non-Believer said:

So Sajid Javid walks as Chancellor after refusing to (at least partly) relinquish control of Treasury to the unelected Dominic Cummings and advisors ( Sky News).

Bojo's having a giraffe...

Not so.  SJ was asked to shed "advisors" who were not cooperating with the agenda that BoJo was intent on insisting on and obviously they had to go. Foolishly SJ chose not to comply.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Rog said:

In your opinion maybe but that doesn't mean that you're right. In fact the outcome of the last general election clearly shows that the majority of the UK electorate rightly believed that she and her arse up plans for BREXIT were NOT what was wanted, we wanted BREXIT and everything that came with it at ANY price.   Likewise we didn't want any form of socialism, and the appalling antisemitism of Momentum and the Corbyn ideals just added further reasons he and the Momentum/Labour idealists were given the "Bums Rush" by the decent right thinking people.  

As I have posted previously I REALLY REALLY want those who voted Leave to get EXACTLY the brexit they voted for.

Which will be wonderful - because Roger says so...

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Rog said:

We don't NEED  EU trade deals with the European Commission.

Let's just end the far too long transition stage EARLY and walk away - and then sort out any trade deals with the whole world.

Who mentioned EU trade deals. There is a whole wide World out there (7 continents!) to make deals with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Rog said:

Not so.  SJ was asked to shed "advisors" who were not cooperating with the agenda that BoJo was intent on insisting on and obviously they had to go. Foolishly SJ chose not to comply.  

Treasury has always needed to operate independently from No.10 for the obvious need for fiscal prudence as opposed to political expediencey. As does the BOE. Said fiscal prudence and democracy should not be usurped by the unelected. I thought we just left the EU on those grounds?

How many people voted for Dominic Cummings again?

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Non-Believer said:

Treasury has always needed to operate independently from No.10 for the obvious need for fiscal prudence as opposed to political expediencey. As does the BOE. Said fiscal prudence and democracy should not be usurped by the unelected. I thought we just left the EU on those grounds?

How many people voted for Dominic Cummings again?

Tre treasury has NOT always operated from HMG, that was a bit of chicanery that charlatan Gordon Brown introduced. 

In any case Dominic is a (rightly) trusted advisor. On that basis no one needed to vote for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Rog said:

Tre treasury has NOT always operated from HMG, that was a bit of chicanery that charlatan Gordon Brown introduced. 

In any case Dominic is a (rightly) trusted advisor. On that basis no one needed to vote for him.

Then the UK is more screwed than anybody could have possibly previously realised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Rog said:

Tre treasury has NOT always operated from HMG, that was a bit of chicanery that charlatan Gordon Brown introduced. 

In any case Dominic is a (rightly) trusted advisor. On that basis no one needed to vote for him.

Hardly chicanery by Broon.

For years unscrupulous politicians had fucked around with interest rates prior to elections to ensure they got the votes. Especially the tories because of their already well-off supporters having large mortgages to end up with quite a pile.

It was in the Labour Manifesto and after their win he just went and did it and put an end to boom and bust cycles.

Good for him...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, mojomonkey said:

I reckon Bernard Ingham was probably the first public one. Be nice if it was elected people that actually ran things instead of civil servants and "advisors", but you're right it has always gone on.

I just think that before Blair they were al little more reticent. As Maggie said "Advisors advise, ministers decide." Admittedly, she did also say "every Prime Minister needs a Willie".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, mojomonkey said:

I reckon Bernard Ingham was probably the first public one. Be nice if it was elected people that actually ran things instead of civil servants and "advisors", but you're right it has always gone on.

That's OK. But one day you are going to elect a Parliament that's full of preening useless tossers. Then what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...