Rushen Spy Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 The prorogation was legal and remains legal. No law was broken therefore it cannot possibly be illegal. It is this stupid kangaroo "court" of establishment shills who are in contempt of the law. They have shown who really rules the UK and it isn't the people, parliament, the government, or even the monarch: it's nouveau riche yuppie / upper bourgeoisie / champagne socialists who operate in both public and private sector. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.K. Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 58 minutes ago, Rushen Spy said: The prorogation was legal and remains legal. No law was broken therefore it cannot possibly be illegal. It is this stupid kangaroo "court" of establishment shills who are in contempt of the law. They have shown who really rules the UK and it isn't the people, parliament, the government, or even the monarch: it's nouveau riche yuppie / upper bourgeoisie / champagne socialists who operate in both public and private sector. Have to say the Supreme Court folks didn't look much like your description... In modern times prorogation is not the Prime Ministers gift to sideline our sovereign parliament in order to sneak through appallingly damaging legislation without due oversight. The Supreme Court were quite right that Johnson had deliberately prorogued parliament FOR AN UNPRECEDENTED FIVE WEEKS for purely political gain. People vote for their MP's to represent them in the HoC. They can't do that if the HoC has been prorogued. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rushen Spy Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 1 hour ago, Rushen Spy said: The prorogation was legal and remains legal. No law was broken therefore it cannot possibly be illegal. It is this stupid kangaroo "court" of establishment shills who are in contempt of the law. They have shown who really rules the UK and it isn't the people, parliament, the government, or even the monarch: it's nouveau riche yuppie / upper bourgeoisie / champagne socialists who operate in both public and private sector. 26 minutes ago, P.K. said: Have to say the Supreme Court folks didn't look much like your description... They looked exactly like my description, especially that creepy smug old hag with the spider lapel. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 1 hour ago, P.K. said: Dear me. I guess if you're a brexiteer lying becomes a matter of habit..... Not defending Johnson. Just stating fact. You might not like it but it is fact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 32 minutes ago, P.K. said: People vote for their MP's to represent them in the HoC. That would be a pleasant change considering that 84% of them were elected on a Brexit manifesto. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 2 hours ago, manxman1980 said: You are an idiot. nice you don't understand sovereignty........ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted September 25, 2019 Share Posted September 25, 2019 (edited) 13 hours ago, P.K. said: Quite. Really looking forward to the next QT. No doubt they'll be a lot of angry people shouting their empty slogans. Got to be worth recording that one. Edited September 25, 2019 by woody2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.K. Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 9 hours ago, woolley said: Not defending Johnson. Just stating fact. You might not like it but it is fact. Do me a favour. Bang to rights. You may not like it but you are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.K. Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 9 hours ago, woolley said: That would be a pleasant change considering that 84% of them were elected on a Brexit manifesto. Keep sucking those lemons... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.K. Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 15 hours ago, Rushen Spy said: They looked exactly like my description, especially that creepy smug old hag with the spider lapel. Lady Hale looks like a nouveau riche yuppie....? The more of TJ's posts I read the more I believe in a parallel universe.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 7 hours ago, P.K. said: Keep sucking those lemons... Meaning you have no answer to the truth of my statement. MPs were given their orders and impertinently declined to carry them out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.K. Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 5 minutes ago, woolley said: Meaning you have no answer to the truth of my statement. MPs were given their orders and impertinently declined to carry them out. Actually meaning I couldn't be arsed checking the veracity of your statement because I just don't care either way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxman1980 Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 17 hours ago, woolley said: That would be a pleasant change considering that 84% of them were elected on a Brexit manifesto. 10 minutes ago, woolley said: Meaning you have no answer to the truth of my statement. MPs were given their orders and impertinently declined to carry them out. I can see where you are coming from, however, extending your logic would also mean that any majority government which fails to deliver on each and everyone of it's manifesto promises should also be regarded with contempt. How many times has that truly happened? We all know that and accept each party produces a manifesto but also that each candidate will have their own local manifesto's and promises to their constituents. Also, don't forget that more people voted against Conservative candidates than voted for them. It is a quirk of the first past the post voting system that allows MP's to be elected when more people voted for other candidates than voted in favour of the winning candidate. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quilp Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 15 minutes ago, P.K. said: Actually meaning I couldn't be arsed checking the veracity of your statement because I just don't care either way. Thus proving you're trolling. Nothing to add except the usual smug derision and snide. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 25 minutes ago, manxman1980 said: I can see where you are coming from, however, extending your logic would also mean that any majority government which fails to deliver on each and everyone of it's manifesto promises should also be regarded with contempt. How many times has that truly happened? We all know that and accept each party produces a manifesto but also that each candidate will have their own local manifesto's and promises to their constituents. Also, don't forget that more people voted against Conservative candidates than voted for them. It is a quirk of the first past the post voting system that allows MP's to be elected when more people voted for other candidates than voted in favour of the winning candidate. remoaner maths again........ did you know more people in scotland voted for leave parties than the snp..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.