woody2 Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 http://www.thenational.scot/news/15200936.MPs_tell_May_she_must_formally_respond_to_Nicola_Sturgeon_over_Brexit____as_a_matter_of_urgency___/503 Service Unavailable Working for me, try clearing your cache. or try linking to a proper news site.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojomonkey Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 Forget it woody, i was only trying to be helpful, i was making no comment on the article. Amazing that you can dismiss something you can't even read, i believe the term is ignorant. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 Forget it woody, i was only trying to be helpful, i was making no comment on the article. Amazing that you can dismiss something you can't even read, i believe the term is ignorant. ffs its a known fake news site supported by the snp..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatshaft Posted April 4, 2017 Author Share Posted April 4, 2017 Forget it woody, i was only trying to be helpful, i was making no comment on the article. Amazing that you can dismiss something you can't even read, i believe the term is ignorant. ffs its a known fake news site supported by the snp..... It's owned by the Glasgow herald, has no links to the SNP, and "fake news" isn't news you disagree with you utter fuckwit. it's an accurate report that not a single UK newspaper is reporting. Do you wonder why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lxxx Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 For me, one of the most inexcusable near silences was that of Labour and Corbyn. When he did eventually speak up, Corbyn spoke with such obvious insincerity that his message outshone his lukewarm words. He did very little more than say that on balance, he supported remain. He urged no one to vote remain, he did nothing to point out the material benefits that the EU brings to economically disadvantaged areas. It was exactly those Labour voting areas that were key in swinging it in favour of 'leave'. A more vigorous Labour campaign that focussed on getting the facts out would have made a difference, But I thought the reasons for remaining were obvious, why did people need it pointing out to them by their leaders? If the material benefits need spelling out so graphically then it seems the whole premise for remaining isn't quite so clear cut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 Forget it woody, i was only trying to be helpful, i was making no comment on the article. Amazing that you can dismiss something you can't even read, i believe the term is ignorant. ffs its a known fake news site supported by the snp..... It's owned by the Glasgow herald, has no links to the SNP, and "fake news" isn't news you disagree with you utter fuckwit. it's an accurate report that not a single UK newspaper is reporting. Do you wonder why? cos its fake news scottard..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatshaft Posted April 4, 2017 Author Share Posted April 4, 2017 It's hilarious the way the barely literate populists construct insults by simply adding -tard to the object of their criticism! Poptards! Forget it woody, i was only trying to be helpful, i was making no comment on the article. Amazing that you can dismiss something you can't even read, i believe the term is ignorant. ffs its a known fake news site supported by the snp..... It's owned by the Glasgow herald, has no links to the SNP, and "fake news" isn't news you disagree with you utter fuckwit. it's an accurate report that not a single UK newspaper is reporting. Do you wonder why? cos its fake news scottard..... Yeah, what guzzi says. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 provide a link to the mps statement then scottard..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guzzi Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 For me, one of the most inexcusable near silences was that of Labour and Corbyn. When he did eventually speak up, Corbyn spoke with such obvious insincerity that his message outshone his lukewarm words. He did very little more than say that on balance, he supported remain. He urged no one to vote remain, he did nothing to point out the material benefits that the EU brings to economically disadvantaged areas. It was exactly those Labour voting areas that were key in swinging it in favour of 'leave'. A more vigorous Labour campaign that focussed on getting the facts out would have made a difference, But I thought the reasons for remaining were obvious, why did people need it pointing out to them by their leaders? If the material benefits need spelling out so graphically then it seems the whole premise for remaining isn't quite so clear cut. Both sides of the argument needed to be cogently put. The exit side did so pursusivly, notwithstanding that much of what they said was untrue. The remain side was poor, and relied too much on negatives about leaving, and failed to get the benefits of membership across clearly. Corbin, effectively, bolstered leave whilst he mouthed support for remain. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatshaft Posted April 4, 2017 Author Share Posted April 4, 2017 provide a link to the mps statement then scottard..... https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/exiting-the-european-union-committee/news-parliament-2015/brexit-white-paper-report-published-16-17/ "fake news-tard"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 "benefits of membership" no such thing..... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 Woody is like a supermarket own version of donald trump 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 provide a link to the mps statement then scottard..... https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/exiting-the-european-union-committee/news-parliament-2015/brexit-white-paper-report-published-16-17/ "fake news-tard"? that does not mention- MPs_tell_May_she_must_formally_respond_to_Nicola_Sturgeon_over_Brexit____as_a_matter_of_urgency__ fakenews..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatshaft Posted April 4, 2017 Author Share Posted April 4, 2017 provide a link to the mps statement then scottard..... https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/exiting-the-european-union-committee/news-parliament-2015/brexit-white-paper-report-published-16-17/ "fake news-tard"? that does not mention- MPs_tell_May_she_must_formally_respond_to_Nicola_Sturgeon_over_Brexit____as_a_matter_of_urgency__ fakenews..... The Government must establish a more effective process for engaging the devolved administrations in developing the UK's negotiating position through the Joint Ministerial Committee for EU Negotiations (JMC (EN)). And the Committee recommends that the UK Government respond formally to the Welsh, Scottish and Northern Ireland legislatures regarding each of their options papers as a matter of urgency. Hilary Benn MP said: "There are significant differences in the negotiating priorities of the different parts of the UK. If the future deal is to be acceptable to the whole of the UK, then these differences will need to be discussed, negotiated and common ground agreed upon. Ministers must share more information with the devolved administrations and discuss options before decisions are reached." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatshaft Posted April 4, 2017 Author Share Posted April 4, 2017 Whereas, the Yoon owned The National said And the Committee on Exiting the European Union appeared to confirm her criticism, saying: “We recommend that the UK Government respond formally to the Welsh, Scottish and Northern Ireland legislatures regarding each of their options papers. It must do so as a matter of urgency, given that negotiations to leave the EU will start imminently.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.