Bobbie Bobster Posted April 16, 2017 Share Posted April 16, 2017 Everest and skiing analogies! Jackpot! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barlow Strada Posted April 16, 2017 Share Posted April 16, 2017 the skiing one is actually rather an accurate one. and then there's gluhwein/Bushy's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbie Bobster Posted April 16, 2017 Share Posted April 16, 2017 That turns out not to be the case. Try searching for the terms on previous TT topics and you'll see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gettafa Posted April 16, 2017 Share Posted April 16, 2017 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarne Posted April 16, 2017 Share Posted April 16, 2017 That infographic was fun. I approve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lost Login Posted April 16, 2017 Share Posted April 16, 2017 The idea of the inquest in this case was to establish what caused the accident that led the the riders death. Sorry but if this was a Coroners Inquest then according to the IoM Courts Website you are wrong https://www.courts.im/courtinformation/courtstructure/courts/cofinquests.xml part of the inquest is to determine how the person died In this case it was the result of the head being separated from the body so it seems correct to report. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lost Login Posted April 16, 2017 Share Posted April 16, 2017 the skiing one is actually rather an accurate one. and then there's gluhwein/Bushy's No it is not. If you are comparing to the TT then one is an event/race whilst the other (skiing) is an activity. Different activities. The correct comparison for skiing is riding a motor bike race or alternatively the correct skiing comparison for the TT would be a specific ski race or event? To use your logic you could argue that skiing is really safe as very few get hurt in one specific event compared to the number who get injured annually riding a motorbike. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notwell Posted April 16, 2017 Share Posted April 16, 2017 The idea of the inquest in this case was to establish what caused the accident that led the the riders death.Sorry but if this was a Coroners Inquest then according to the IoM Courts Website you are wrong https://www.courts.im/courtinformation/courtstructure/courts/cofinquests.xml part of the inquest is to determine how the person died In this case it was the result of the head being separated from the body so it seems correct to report. That isn't necessarily the case. Death could have been on initial impact with the road. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hboy Posted April 16, 2017 Share Posted April 16, 2017 (edited) The idea of the inquest in this case was to establish what caused the accident that led the the riders death.Sorry but if this was a Coroners Inquest then according to the IoM Courts Website you are wrong https://www.courts.im/courtinformation/courtstructure/courts/cofinquests.xml part of the inquest is to determine how the person died In this case it was the result of the head being separated from the body so it seems correct to report. That isn't necessarily the case. Death could have been on initial impact with the road. FFS I'm sure being decapitated had a general impact on his health and well being. How to argue that black is white ad infinitum. Edited April 16, 2017 by hboy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notwell Posted April 16, 2017 Share Posted April 16, 2017 He could have been dead before that happened. Very easily in fact. So it isn't necessarily the case that it was that or it needed reporting IMHO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hboy Posted April 16, 2017 Share Posted April 16, 2017 His head was removed. He was pretty much irrevocably dead at that point. FFS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notwell Posted April 16, 2017 Share Posted April 16, 2017 Sigh. You're a weapon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hboy Posted April 16, 2017 Share Posted April 16, 2017 (edited) Sigh. You're a weapon The link Lost Login provided was very clear. No doubt you will argue that black is white with every poster here for pages and bore the shit out of everyone. But FFS someone who crashes and had their head removed through blunt trauma probably died from having their head removed? Why do you keep arguing nonsense ad infinitum? I guess being parted long term from your brain has worked out well for you - but usually 100% of people who have their head cut off die pretty much immediately afterwards. Edited April 16, 2017 by hboy 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notwell Posted April 16, 2017 Share Posted April 16, 2017 It's pointless. You are too thick to understand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hboy Posted April 16, 2017 Share Posted April 16, 2017 It's pointless. You are too thick to understand. No, everyone else has been really clear. Lost Login posted a link to a really good source. You seem to be the only person ranting on about a load of shite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.