RIchard Britten Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Yet you both logged in around the same time... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Yet you both logged in around the same time... nope.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 https://theintercept.com/2017/03/29/you-shouldnt-blame-islam-for-terrorism-religion-isnt-a-crucial-factor-in-attacks/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted March 30, 2017 Share Posted March 30, 2017 Colour me shocked... Government has the head of all the major social media/search engines in for a talk about handing over all your sensitive information helping to fight extremism. And also around about the same time this happened in America...how long before we see this coming our way? https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/03/28/congress_approves_sale_of_internet_histories/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted March 30, 2017 Share Posted March 30, 2017 https://theintercept.com/2017/03/29/you-shouldnt-blame-islam-for-terrorism-religion-isnt-a-crucial-factor-in-attacks/ But....but...the narrative....we have to stick to the narrative to justify our on going war on oil bearing countries/countries that drop the petro-dollar/countries that wont let our Israeli allies build pipelines through them terror Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarne Posted March 30, 2017 Author Share Posted March 30, 2017 Yeah, it's daft. I can see how it could be used to stop terrorism but so could recording every conversation ever in public. It'll just increase signal to noise ratio and the potential for abuse is ludicrously high. There's no way it won't be used to spy on ex girlfriends or wives Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted March 30, 2017 Share Posted March 30, 2017 Yeah, it's daft. I can see how it could be used to stop terrorism but so could recording every conversation ever in public. It'll just increase signal to noise ratio and the potential for abuse is ludicrously high. There's no way it won't be used to spy on ex girlfriends or wives As if they would do anything wrong... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3378059/Police-illegally-logged-22billion-car-journeys-Surveillance-tsar-s-warning-data-network-8-300-Big-Brother-cameras-capture-number-plate-details-drivers-faces.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manxman1980 Posted March 30, 2017 Share Posted March 30, 2017 I haven't noticed any reference to the IRA in this thread. They killed many people during "the troubles" but I don't remember calls to kick Catholics out of the UK or bank Irish people from the country. Maybe thats because Irish Catholics/Nationalists are not visibly different from "us". Just saying.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gizo Posted March 30, 2017 Share Posted March 30, 2017 So are we all agreed it wasn't a terrorist attack. Some dude killed people. It wasn't Isis or al Queda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 To quote.. "He was a violent Christian before he was a violent Muslim" Or in broader terms, he was a cunt before he converted, and he was a cunt after he converted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chinahand Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 You don't get it do you Richard. Islamofascism gave him a (religiously based) justification to take his violence to a far higher level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody2 Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 So are we all agreed it wasn't a terrorist attack. no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIchard Britten Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 You don't get it do you Richard. Islamofascism gave him a (religiously based) justification to take his violence to a far higher level. He didn't need a reason to be a violent arsehole, it just gave him an excuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 You don't get it do you Richard. Islamofascism gave him a (religiously based) justification to take his violence to a far higher level. He didn't need a reason to be a violent arsehole, it just gave him an excuse. Islam seems to be good at that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the stinking enigma Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 So are we all agreed it wasn't a terrorist attack.noIt terrified woody. That's about it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.